Published: 06-12-2021
Updated: 04-03-2024
Civilisation as we know it will fall. That is something I’m absolutely certain of. When that will happen, or where it will be at when it restarts, I do not know. Perhaps we’ll be looking at a world similar to what we’ve seen depicted in many post-apocalyptic themed movies. Or perhaps it’s a world that can get back on its feet quickly, with much of its prior knowledge and infrastructure still intact. Which ever state it is in it will be a world with a people that will need guidance. I hope my work can help them plot a course towards an enlightened society. The more the old is destroyed though, the better the new has a chance to succeed and be something truly different. And most importantly we need to understand that the extent to which we can be part of the solutions for this new world is determined by the extent to which we are willing to see how we were part of the flaws of the world that was before. This, is the resurrection.
We’ll find the world on either end of that spectrum or somewhere in between. One thing should be absolutely clear; things cannot and should not return to the way they were before the fall. There’s lessons we need to learn, desperately. If we don’t, we’ll weave the same old hellish thread into our new clothes. This will expose our descendants to the same demonic forces we’ve faced ourselves, but with the technology of the future as its blade. I’ve said this before. You need to understand its importance. The result of this would surely be the absolute end of humanity. It cannot be overstated. We better learn this lesson for good or the future we build for our offspring will enslave them to the machine eternally. Their existence an ever lasting prison sentence. Their future forlorn and meaningless.
This is something we must prevent at all costs, and the only way to do that is to understand that we as individuals need to change in order for a truly changed society to rise out of the ashes of the old. The first thing we need to do to get a civilisation going, is for everyone to be civilised to other people on an individual level. It is that simple and yet this is the most difficult step of this process. We need to shed our fear of each other and build trust, contribute positively together, and not fall into barbarism. Only if by choice individuals are willing to achieve liberation from fear will the society they build be something truly changed. This cannot be forced. You cannot force people to be enlightened. Force uses fear as a motivator, both by the enforced and the enforcer. It can only lead to the expression of evil. Our motivations need to come from within, from feelings of love and acceptance of that love.
When society falls, food will become expensive. This is normal, and it will eventually become more affordable again. In a society where those that grow the food live in poverty and those that own the infrastructure for how most of that food is sold are wealthy, you know a pyramid scheme economy is being run by elitist owners. We need to get rid of our narcissistic traits if we want to progress our species. In order for the rein of big money to end we don’t just need to take away the wealth of the elites. We need to get rid of our own appeal to becoming wealthy ourselves so we stop defending the existence of tycoons and stop dismissing their corruptive influence on society’s legislation and law. Our new society should be one that is full of feedback systems that keep the balance. Evil behaviour should never result in a gain of power, but the loss of it.
This chapter and the one after may very well be the most difficult ones to write of all. I’ve also been working on this chapter the longest. Some of my oldest notes are part of the text you’re about to read. Now that I’ve told you in the previous chapters about what may very well be the past for you it’s time for me to tell you about the better future I have seen. It is a beautiful world, I assure you that much. But it is a world that took the long road. The people in it came from afar, spiritually. They’d been through hell, and it helped calibrate their spirits. I do not know that world yet, and neither do I know the hell they’ve gone through. I’ve seen glimpses of both, but still I saw them through the relative comfort of my current life. My house is warm and my stomach full. I will always view and interpret these images through the spectacles of my own current reality, and I feel uncertain as to my ability to write what I saw without the taint of my own misconceptions about the possibilities for humanity. I will try my best, regardless.
There are many areas where change is desperately needed for our new society. The ones that need to be overhauled first are economy, government and education, but they are by far the only ones. I will lay out which things I think need changing, will highlight why I think they need to change, will make suggestions for changes, and will try and state what the desired outcome of any changes we make is.
Economy:
If we can rebuild the world, what do we need to make it a better place than it was, and how do we prevent history from repeating itself? To understand this you really need to understand the essence of chapter 04. The first step towards a better society is without any doubt to get away from central banking and inflation driven money trade. We need to get as far away from it as possible. Money has been the fuel of evil ever since we conjured it. If you’ve read and understood all my work you understand why this is and how this works spiritually. It is difficult for me to envision a society without currency though. Perhaps it is possible and I am too limited to visualise it. I hope it is possible, and that we’ll do it that way. But in case such a moneyless society proves too difficult at first, we have to make a decentralised money system should we decide to introduce currency again, so bankers cannot manipulate the worth of money by deflating it through loaning and printing. Furthermore should profit by inflating worth never become a goal for anyone ever again. No one should be able to manipulate the flow of currency. The way things are now, money is the ultimate expression of evil. There’s no connection between the one who spends the money and the hard labour of those who gave it its virtual worth. But before I continue I want to address something I am experiencing myself now. While I was typing this, I could feel the judgement of a potential reader telling me I’m suggesting moneyless socialism. I cannot shake that idea without putting that thought to rest.
In rebuttal I could point to prior chapters where I stated my comparison between the different systems and how I concluded they aren’t all that different, or even direct you at a quote further up in this chapter, but instead I want to tell you something else. In my time as a student, I often struggled financially to a point I would rarely if at all look at my bank account. It was often a negative number at the end of the month, so I dared not check. Often times I had no idea how much or little money I had. But this habit lingered on even when I got a paid internship and I had plenty of funds. I just lived my life, bought food, occasionally went out with friends. In a way I was actually living life without money, and still did what I wanted to do, which is study to become a teacher and live my life with social interaction, serenity, and peace. I’ll pass you this anecdote to illustrate why I think a way of life without money is possible. For all intents and purposes I lived without money for a few years. My greed was capped, but I didn’t suffer at all and lived just fine. I had food and entertainment, and a future I was growing towards. I didn’t think I was going to become rich and that didn’t stop me from developing myself as a human being. I think we have it in us somewhere. We’ve just been marinated into the philosophy we really need greed as our motivation to deploy ourselves. I truly think we don’t. We need to replace our search for growth in wealth with a search for spiritual growth. If we do that I believe we’ll remove a darkness from our lives that has held us back as a species, and we’ll be wealthy enough to live our lives, just like we do now, but without the constant stress due to the fear of losing our financial battle with the system.
Right now, money keeps people in check. The economy isn’t about trade; it’s a control mechanism. Without it, people would claim items, places, creatures, and labour for themselves, and the physically strongest would be the tyrants in power. The controlling power of the economy through money prevents that. It prevents someone from claiming an apartment and living there. Now there’s rent to be paid so they can either afford it or not. Financial debt enslaves us and results in forced labour as a net gain for those who own the loan. The tyrants in this system are the ones that control the currency. The financial industry owes its existence almost entirely through exploiting the anomalies that the money coupon system spawns. Through money people are being conditioned to see their essential needs as less valuable than the products and status that come from the spoils of the excess of production of essentials. We look down upon farmers, lumber-jacks, and oil rig workers, because there is little money to be made in their profession, while we’re idolising management positions. We think that a TV and a smartphone are worth more than a loaf of bread, and the fact that their value expressed in money is indeed much more, shows us just how much excess production of essentials there must be at this moment. Ask the people in Bosnia in the 1990s during the civil war what they would rather have.
Money disfigures our perception of true worth and wealth. This trains us to lose our humanity. In a money driven society where inflation is the driver for wealth gain people generally want what’s best for themselves first before thinking about others. That might work for a while on a level playing field but that state of mind has devastating effects when it concerns the influence of a banker or a billionaire. Large financial interests with a monopolistic grip on their market suffer the same flaws as the dictators in dictatorships do. Their rule is law, and if they’ve got some ideas that are not in the best interest of the people they can force it anyway and they have the means to silence voices critical of their actions. Corporations and any other kind of large organisations that handle large amounts of wealth should be forbidden, because making a profit will always come before treating their customers right. You might be inclined to think this is a self-correcting system, as providing bad services or selling bad products will motivate customers to not do business with a certain company, but that is not the reality I’ve experienced in my life. This only works if there are other companies out there that treat their customers better and/or sell them better products. If the thing you as a customer want can only be acquired at one company that holds the monopoly, or all companies that can provide it treat their customers equally poorly and/or sell equally shitty products, you’ll soon understand there is no balance, but a decline of quality in pursuit of quantity. Think about it; most business were not started to serve you. They were started to gain the owners and investors profit. Your needs will always come secondary to the owners’ needs.
It is my conviction that this greed for profit is the driving force behind the current decline of quality, honesty, and humanity in today’s business world. There is no balance between how customers are treated and the profit made by businesses on the larger scale, because companies have become so huge, pushing such enormous amounts of wealth around, they’re buying out their competitors and destroying the free market for little businesses. It was high time 50 years ago when we should have acknowledged the shift in power of big money. There is surely a formula behind the process of the gain of power in a certain corporation until it becomes untouchable for the law. The elites have nothing productive to add to human society. Their only skill in which they excel is the ability to mend their wealth and excerpt a corruptive influence over society to maintain and increase that wealth. Increasing their wealth increases their power within that system. A system over which they undoubtedly rule. It’s an exponential growth. The world I grew up in is in dire need of rules to forbid big business to harm our biosphere, lobbying our political leaders, and implementing any kind of social engineering for whatever purpose. The change starts with us though. Humanity as a whole needs to acknowledge that at a certain level an individual must reach a ceiling when it comes to wealth. Who needs more than one villa? And if you have a yacht, do you really need a villa? How much acres of land does one person really need if you’re not a farmer? When is enough really enough? If you really want a bigger ship, can’t you share that ship with others who want the same?
I’m just asking these questions out loud here. We need to be honest as a species and agree that wealth needs to be capped, but not for you and me as it is now. Right now, the financial gain of the common people is already covertly capped by the current system. I do not mean strengthening that cap, but to shift it to another position and subject any possible future elites to it. I’m talking about a form of capping so we don’t have any billionaires any more. No more globalist owners. No more tycoons or financial juggernauts. And no more loopholes! No one should be allowed to trick and scheme through their (combined) wealth to give them more leverage in the spiritual journey of our future society and its people. Wealth may be combined for a project, but only with consent of all, and not to create something to force others to do or discourage them from doing something. Consent that doesn’t forfeit anyone’s right to take back what’s theirs. Those days really have to be behind us. And nobody has to live in poverty, and the bottom of the ladder still needs to be a life without hunger, and the top of the ladder may be a thing worthy of pursuit, but we need to put a break on power and influence. Misuse should be prevented vigorously. Being wealthy simply needs to mean you live comfortably. And becoming wealthy should be reachable by actual hard labour in essentials. The farmers, lumber-jacks, and oil rig workers should actually be our wealthiest, and not their CEOs who sit behind a desk.
Our currency should be decentralised, with a fixed amount of it going round. This way, if production of food and energy, and other essentials are going well, the value of the currency per unit will be high. If it’s low, we know how to fix it; consume less and/or produce more essentials. This way we all have the ability to influence our currency for the better. Any wealth made in excess should be spent where it is most needed. I imagine this would be one of the ways that would turn gaining too much wealth from something potentially evil into something good. Any time there is a surplus over your limit, you get to feed hungry kids, or help restore nature, or better the healthcare system, or support a science project. In a perfect economy, debt does not exist and is – at least to a large extent – forbidden. The success of a business wouldn’t be measured quantitatively in financial profit, but in the quality of its service and/or their product. Capped wealth will make sure businesses stay small. By keeping businesses small they stay personal, so contact is real contact, and not the fakery of “customer service” that attempts to emulate personal contact by having you chat with a bot. By capping elitist wealth we give people the ability to have a better life if they work hard for it. We definitely don’t need entitled rich people. Everyone that works in the same business shares a similar salary. Owners should be replaced by founders. And I think the founder may honestly deserve the biggest share without any shame, but the days where owners make tenfold or even thousandfold more than the next highest paid employee are truly behind us. If business goes well, everyone benefits, which will motivate all to give it their best effort to the availment of the quality of the products and/or service of their establishment. Financial equality makes all equally responsible for their income within the same business.
Again, I know this might still sound a lot like socialist communism, and admittedly on paper it shares similarities. I’ve thought about this a lot and concluded the similarities are there but the difference is that I suggest an economy void of global ownership, or dictators, and by people that lived through the horrors of an unconnected world. I think the economy we should build should take into careful consideration everything I’ve written about spiritual connections and their relation to the good vs. evil dynamic. This needs to be part of the equation for this not to become the next abusive system that puts people in power that are the most unfit to handle any power, and who will cement themselves in that position while the people slave away as the foundation of that position. By putting a cap on elitism I’ve not introduced anything new, I’ve only remove the real cap today’s economy has on climbing out of your own wealth class, and placed that cap somewhere higher under the realm of the elites. The cap was already there, but it kept us poor. People should be able to live a better life by contributing to the whole of humanity positively. If someone just wants to live their life without all that hassle that should be fine; they should be able to live without going hungry. Those that grow the food and produce the energy by their own labour should naturally not be poor, but should be able to live well. Whatever economy we build it must aim to connect people to themselves, this Earth, and to each other, and it should encourage people to climb spiritually.
Fear is a powerful motivator, which is the root cause for many of the problems of the world in which I grew up. It is by our hunger for things to own and people to control that we’ve developed this intense greed, which stems from the fear of not having enough for ourselves. Our greed casts the illusion on us that there just isn’t enough for everyone, making it a self-fulfilling prophecy by how it compels us to gain material wealth and seek power over others. Money and power act like a magnifying glass on a person’s innate greed. The more they have the bigger their greed is magnified, revealing ever more details. Details that would not be noticed in a common person’s greed. Our greed creates systems that further grow and nurture that greed. We need a system that doesn’t magnify the bad in us, but instead promotes on the good in us. Systems can create wonderful freedoms but also terrible imprisoning control. It all depends on who serves who. Does the system serve you or do you serve the system? When a system serves you, that’s where good will thrive, but when you serve a system, that’s where evil will thrive. Where evil thrives it grows in strength until it has gathered so much control it spawns people that think they can own the world. But nobody owns the world. We share it with everyone. We must stop putting price tags on everything in it.
What you do with your properties within your living space is for you to know, but we should honestly and openly be able to question ourselves on how many things we can permit ourselves responsibly to lay claim on as our property without inviting evil into our existence. Whatever the conclusion of that debate is going to be; outside of that living space the world is shared. We must treat her like it is not ours, but something we borrowed from someone else. We need to handle her responsibly and be willing to be held accountable towards anyone we share this world with for all our actions concerning what we do to this world. And we need to do that openly and honestly, without hiding behind rules, regulations, and protocols. Every time anyone hides behind those things they sign a contract with the devil, by trying not to take responsibility for their choices; the hallmark of evil. In order to share the world responsibly we need to keep our population under control. I don’t wish to suggest anything extreme, but let’s please be adults about this. If we can all agree on a two children limit when we have reached whatever maximum head count we agreed upon we can make sure we don’t spread over this Earth like a poisonous spore again. Keeping our population in check would also mean we don’t suck up all of Earth’s resources that much, produce less waste, and can all have a decent home with some land around it. Nobody should be living in tall buildings with only a balcony for fresh air; everyone should have a garden so they can connect to mother Earth physically. Children need to be able to grow up and play in nature, not be locked up in an apartment behind addictive computer screens.
So how are we supposed to handle our financial economy in the future to prevent the mistakes of the past? The answer of this lies buried in the texts of chapter 04. I will expand on it here and will try to make this as clear as I can. I invite you to study the chart above this paragraph. From chapter 04 you’ve learned that the value of currency comes from the excess productions of essentials, and available labour. But not just any labour. Only the labour that adds benefit or essentiality to the essential resources will increase their value. I will give you some examples, but let me first explain the chart. It shows that resources can remain in one of three states after they’ve been mined/harvested/collected; they can be in storage, in transport, or can be transformed. You’ll see I’ve put a green square around ‘resources’ and ‘transformation’, and an orange square around ‘storage’ and ‘transport’. The most value from our currency comes from these. Resources (most of all essential ones) have innate value. The labour of collecting those resources and putting them into our system liberates that innate value for the currency used to purchase them. Most of the value of money comes from this. From here, the resources can be stored, transported, and/or transformed. Transformation is on second place where extra value for the currency is liberated. This increases the innate value of the resource through specialised labour. It adds new properties to the resource, or refines properties already present. Storage and transport do add a small amount of value to the resource, but it also takes value out of the currency. It depends on the means and duration of the storage, and means and distance of transport. There is labour involved, but this also costs (other) resources. It might result in a net gain in value, but not always. Often there is a net gain though, but much less so than the green boxed ones.
All currency value exits the system again through consumption, which is in essence the destruction of the resources (eating food, burning fuel, breaking the appliance so you need to replace it, etc.). Let me give you some examples of how this can work. Note these are oversimplified examples. Let’s imagine several ways grain can be handles in this system. Grain can be grown, harvested, stored in a silo on the farm, collected and transported to a packaging plant, transported to a distribution centre, and sold to customers as ‘whole grain’, who will eventually consume it. So from collection we have storage (on the farm) -> transport (farm to plant) -> transformation (putting it in a package) -> storage (at the plant) -> transport (from plant to store) -> storage (at the store) -> transport (from store to house) -> storage (at the house) -> consumption. This one was really simple and with ‘whole grain’. I skipped a few steps where most often in our day and age there might be more than one distribution centre involved before and after the packaging plant. In this example, most of the value comes from the grain itself through growing, liberated by the harvest. But instead of whole grain, imagine now the grain will be milled before packaging. That’s no slight transformation. Besides the innate value of the grain, much value was now added to this resource. It involves more parties too, but I’ll spare you the chain of this route, because I think you get the picture. Now imagine not just the flower, but also other resources needed to make an apple pie (in case you’re wondering; yes, I really like apple pie). All ingredients needed to make an apple pie all have their own routes, and when they all converge into a bakery or grandma’s kitchen, the labour and skill involved in baking an apple pie adds to the total value. The resources were changed significantly (transformation).
But arguably an apple pie is a luxury. There are so many essentials – like water or fuel – that go through this same process. Water needs to be collected, transported, cleaned, and transported again. I’m not just talking about bottled water here, but also tap water for example. There are a few exceptions, like water from boreholes or mountain streams, but most water isn’t instantly drinkable for us. Transport through the tubes of the tap water system adds some value to this because of how efficiently this is done, compared to someone having to carry it all the way from where it was treated. Fuel is even more complex, but nevertheless an essential. But how about resources like iron ore, or sand. We use both as building material, same as wood. Are they not essential? Bluntly, no, but to be able to transport and transform our resources, and increase their value, we need specialised tools, devices, and machines, used inside special places, performing specialised labour skills. The tools, devices, and machines, as well as the specialised places where we transform our (essential) resources all need to be made from resources. They are, in regard to transformation, essential, but to the overall process they are less essential than the essential resources mentioned in chapter 04. Without them we could not develop and apply our skills in transformation, though, so they are definitely important to adding value to our resources.
Through these examples I hope you can understand that there is much to be said for things to be transported least as possible, not just for the value of currency, but also for environmental reasons. Right now, in The Netherlands, much of our cow milk is transported to China, where it is condensed and dried, and ground into powder, just to be transported back here and be sold to factories that use it in products like cookies and baby formula. This transport forth and back over thousands of miles devalues the innate value of the resource, but the reason this is possible is apparently because the labour in China is so stupendously cheap that the cost of transportation over that distance twice is still cheaper than to turn it into powder here. And that just illustrates even further how the elite exploit the poor people who they cannot do without, but I’ve ranted about that before, so let me stick to the topic at hand here. In an ideal world, the products would be sold locally, and any and all transformations that can happen locally do so. This way we prevent much global ownership taking hold of distribution lines and exploiting them further, cause they don’t add value through these schemes; they take innate value out of the system for themselves. Local collection, storage, transport, and transformation keeps the innate wealth of the resources in the hands of the people and out of the hands of elites, and the excess of their production can be sold over distance adding value to the currency system as a whole. There is no sane reason to import Spanish strawberries while we export Dutch grown strawberries to other nations.
What can be grown locally should be grown locally. It’s a different matter for exotic fruits like mangos and pineapples, but in their case the transportation adds a little value to its innate value at its destination, cause without transportation the Dutch would not be able to buy them. But that extra value comes at the cost of the consumption of the fuel for that transport. That’s why mangos and pineapples (should) cost more here than they do at the places where they can be grown. And that I think is what we should aim for. Local production and consumption where it is possible and feasible. This means that fruits grown locally should always be cheaper than imported fruits, and the prices today in the supermarket show just how skewed this has become. When things need to come afar, there should be as little global ownership involved as possible, so that no inflation schemes can be built, and the innate value of essential resources – and the labour to transform them – cannot be illegitimately leeched by elite parasites. Now, if you’ve found it difficult to read these last few paragraphs, please reread them, and consciously make distinctions for ‘wealth’ and ‘value’ as they seem interchangeable definitions but from the perspective of this work they are not. I deliberately made those distinctions. ‘Money’ is just a number and symbol of a currency, the ‘value’ of a single coin of money is derived from the worth of excess production of essentials which gets that worth potential from their innate natural ‘wealth’ liberated by collection. Keeping the wealth locally means people locally may not necessarily have a high amount of money, and the value of that currency may vary, while still their own needs are royally accounted for, meaning they have wealth, which just isn’t expressed in money.
But now you may wonder if there are examples of any kind of specialised labour that do not add value to the currency. Ow yes, quite many. Quite many, indeed. If you can recall chapter 04 and the example of the colony on a foreign planet, you will remember that there are essentials they cannot do without, and with them essential labour to utilise those resources for use by the members of the colony. But the bigger the surplus of the produce of essentials, the more this will open up the agendas for other colony members to pursuit other interests. Remember that? Well, those other pursuits is labour that adds less and less value to the currency the further down the essentiality ladder you go, until you arrive at labour that doesn’t add any value. They are members of the colony that are not helping in the essential production, so their potential for the colony is not utilised and they are leaches off the innate value of the collected essential resources and the essential labour of their colony members working with the essentials. Labour that doesn’t in any way aids the essential labour and thus is unessential is the most common labour in my day and age. I don’t judge this, by the way. That would be quite arrogant seeing as I myself perform a profession that is the fruit of excess production. I add very little value to currency. And writing this work is more of the same. I am merely stating what I think are the facts. We cost society resources through our existence. There are no film makers in a long lasting grid down situation, when society grinds to a halt, at least not without its cost on their clan. And the establishment knows how this works and seeks to destroy the value of currency and invested interest of wealthy people outside of their cult through mass production of useless things and shitty media. One of the best examples is the stock value of big media complexes, like Disney and Warner Brothers, who have seen this value absolutely plummet after half a decade of total garbage media, void of any creativity, and rife with woke messages which the public so obviously is not interested in. But it is by design.
Movie making involves the investments of many millionaire stock holders, who’s money is used to financially support the non-essential labour of hundreds of people in the film industry, and a few overpaid actors, but if the movie is guaranteed not to sell tickets, that money has been wasted. And from the view of this work it means that those investors lost control over the value of a part of the currency as it was fed into non-essential labour, meaning the banking system which controls the currency now has increased influence over the remainder of the actual value behind the currency. Now I do believe that escapism in the form of movie and other media formats is important, but I think this format has to change, so it doesn’t spawn elites that will abuse it to gain more control over the wealth involved in making movies. Crowd funded indie films have shown there is another path that is easily possible. And this goes for many other endeavours most likely. I have seen YouTubers make documentaries worthy of being televised. The power of production of many things needs to be in the hands of the common people and not some elite bureaucratic established financial powerhouse.
Government:
There is so much wrong with the way we organise our governments now. So much so that we no longer organise anything about them any more at all. They have grown out of our control. The way governments operate nowadays welcomes evil into it by design. The voting system is a system forced upon us so that we can be free. This isn’t ironic. It is the red flag that shows us we are not free. We cannot escape this “freedom” at all. People who rebel are closer to freedom than those that settle in it. Just because we seem to be voting – or not – out of our own will, does not make this will free. By voting we’re actually consenting to the system, through the illusion you vote against its direction, which is de facto voting to agree the system is allowed to go against your preferred direction. The political left and right are the wings of the same demon; politics. There’s something inherently unfair to our democracy. The democracy of my time allows different people from different walks of life with different educations and different skills and different needs to cast their votes, hoping the end result sits well with all who voted. This is comparable to throwing all kinds of different colours of paint into one bucket and expecting the mixture to be colourful and anything but a blend of grey. Democracy is a governing method where people are free to state opinions on a system they have no true knowledge about. Neither do their votes have the power to change that system in a way that would affect the people who actually control the system.
Voting in our current democracy is a farce. It is just entertainment, and provides the illusion of choice, while offering the established power a voluntary mass poll result to see how many people are on to them. And this polling is therefore being milked for media attention to steer the perception as to conjure the consent to any election outcome, whether legit or cheated. Any media is a show for entertainment purposes, to keep your mind occupied with things that don’t matter, cause they’re about conjuring your consent to the system. Even your vote against it – whether that is through speaking with others about it, or a text comment under a video or article or on your social media, or per voting ballot – conjures your consent for the existence of the system. You may voice to be against its direction, but you consent to the existence of the system itself through that voice. If voting could really diminish the power of the establishment, it would be illegal. Just ask the people in Catalonia Spain what happened in 2017. They held an election that was not controlled by the establishment, to become a politically independent region, separate from Spain. The police was unleashed on those who came to the voting booth, and the media smeared those who participated in it. A majority (over 90% of the people) were for this independence. This was an example of true democracy being slashed by the whip of the totalitarian globalists.
But even still, fair democracy has clear flaws. The truth is that even if voting was done fairly it would still put us in a position where the masses decided over the fate of people they can’t possibly all be connected to, and such spawns a soulless will. And even after a fair vote the politicians basically operate the same way; they decide over the many to which they have few to no connections. Governments around the world are sick, and the decease is called modern politics. It’s a stage to keep the people busy and falsely acquire their consent to forfeit their freedoms so that the owners can abuse the gain of power that consent creates. The left-right duality only serves to make us feel threatened by an opposing faction, while offering the comfort of a side that supports us if we join it. Our enslavement by capitalist billionaires has rendered the public more and more unfit for a real democracy. Governments should protect the people from the corporations, not the other way around. Politicians should keep the corporations in check, not the voters that they are supposed to represent. A truly good government will encourage and help its citizens become self-sustainable. In a real democracy the politicians come with ideas and the people decide. In a fake democracy this is reversed. In a real democracy, all people are well educated and enlightened, so their voting choices don’t spawn anger and confusion, but empathy and curiosity. In a real democracy, government is small, and doesn’t decide over people they are not connected to.
For leaders to lead honourably they need to live amongst the people, not rule from a high tower looking down upon them. In our new world any position of power should be transformed into a position of privilege. It should be a position that gains you status more akin to how martyrdom would, rather than how they gain status as a ruler in my day and age. Gaining power or enriching one’s self in that position should not only be forbidden; it should be immensely frowned upon. If one did fall into temptation, the punishment should always exceed the gain, but the fallen should also always be offered a hand and allowed to get back on their feet and become a part of society again. If we can’t forgive we may take away the motivation for the fallen to climb back up towards the light. Whatever form our future government will take, it will be a system, and a system is a machine-like will. It comes with many dangers and we should be very aware of this. Every time people serve a system that system will embody the will of evil. I know I’m repeating myself here, and I do so because it is imperative that you understand this. A system is a will without a soul and it has parallels to that of an individual with an enormous ego; a falling spirit, cutting connections to facilitate the fall. A system takes no responsibility. It will do evil things. And just like the devil will systems tempt us to join in the fall. Any system that transfers power to a minority through the suffering of the majority is a system of abuse, even if those suffering subjected to it willingly. But a society without systems isn’t much of a society. We need the bad for good to exist. But either the good will serve the evil or the evil will serve the good. Only if a system distributes the gain of power evenly and compensates those that suffer the most more than those that suffer less can the system be deemed fair.
What we need is a system that truly serves the people. Drawing up such a system is no easy task. It’s like using a caged dragon to heat our town, which sounds very efficient, but we need to be weary of the dangers we subject ourselves to. The cage needs to be checked and maintained to prevent any chance of escape, and we need to prevent anyone – especially the feeble minded – from staring into the gaze of the dragon and fall under its spell. And as a last resort we need to be able and willing to kill the dragon if it does turn out to have been able to manipulate us, even if that means turning off the heat in the middle of winter. For our new society this means that any system we build will need to have checks and kill switches to prevent the evil will from turning the tables, and we need a backup plan. Our new system really needs to serve us. In this system, the leaders are the ones who serve the system as a sacrifice they are willing to make. A position of leadership should come with a modest income. The best leaders are those that don’t desire its status. The system itself should serve the masses. It should serve everyone equally, and balance itself out by providing more to those that deserve it more. A system that serves the least powerful parts of it is a system that is least likely to serve evil. There should be no more leeches; everyone can have a part to play in this society. It should aim to connect us all in a positive manner. Everyone has strengths they can bring to the table. Everyone needs to be offered a chance to participate. There should be no more global governments to decide over the many. People can govern themselves. No large system has to be designed for this. The decisions made should come from local communities, and those decisions should never forfeit anyone’s freedom within a community. The governing people in parliament will not decide on local policies. Things that work good in one place may not work somewhere else. Truly good ideas don’t need to be forced. If something works really well, other communities will decide on their own to implement it, democratically.
We may want to change the words for ‘leaders‘ and ‘government‘ to disconnect them from the bad associations to the old ways that may stick to them. I think we should distinguish between those that put out ideas on a larger multi-communal level, and those that organise the debates on a communal level. Maybe the multi-communal leader should be called an ideaist; someone who comes up with ideas on how to improve humanity while making sure it stays faithful to the ten commandments in these texts. These people will be what used to be the political leaders of countries. There shall be no more political parties, as political parties take away the individualism of its members, and has them defend the party rather than function as a politician. Ideaists should be singular individuals who can present ideas and can discuss them with the other individual ideaists. These ideas and their debates can then be presented to local communities. The local leaders are the ones who organise debates around policy topics for those that specialise over the topic and those who the policy would affect. Those local leaders are the ones that ultimately decide, after hearing all parties and sides. They must uphold democratic principles in their decision. The people should decide, but the people are the many, and through the many evil can express itself. And not every individual may know all the variables, and so their vote may be based on erroneous conceptions. Therefore the leaders need to word their decisions well, and be accountable for the outcome of their decisions. Debates are key. If the people disagree with a decision, they can demand another debate to voice their concerns. Any of the debates can be about the propositions of the debates by the ideaists, but also on local things that are only at play in that local community. Local communities should have freedom to decide over things that concern them. Not every mundane thing may be debatable and not everything may deserve a debate, but if the people want to debate something it is binding to organise that debate. The people of local communities can be part of any debate if they want to, but it is not mandatory. But let me make one thing absolutely clear; debates should be rare, as I think people can govern themselves. There’s plenty of examples of off-grid communities that do excellently well without any government interference. People should have the right to be left alone.
The local leaders could be called elders; the people who founded the community and lived the longest in it. The qualification of any leadership position should not be age but wisdom, though I imagine that the wisest are most often older people. Age is a quantifiable qualification and easy to measure, but their wisdom is another story. I wish I had the answer on how to measure this, but I don’t. Perhaps that’s the point of it. Wisdom is a quality, not a quantity. Those who want to know how strong they are compare their strength to that of others today. Those who want to know how wise they are compare their wisdom to themselves of yesterday. Wisdom is about someone’s ability to see themselves from within themselves. I’m hoping that at that point in time we will be able to see the wisdom in a person with ease, and somehow I think the new world will have no shortage of wise people after going through the fall of society. Whether someone is wise is something we should intuitively know. And just like the ideaists, the elders should always make sure that their conduct result in a community that stays faithful to the ten commandments of these texts. Only the wisest of us may be able to succeed in this effort, but who knows. If it turns out someone is not as wise as we thought, they should be removed from their position and replaced. This should not be difficult to do, but not be done on a vague accusation. There needs to be substance.
True wise people would step down when there is genuine distrust, but someone falsely accused should be given a chance to redeem themselves. But to be honest I feel a lot of my own negativity being mixed into these words right now. I’m actually hoping we’ll see a world where this kind of mistrust isn’t part of our society. A society that needs these kinds of rules and boundaries is one where people have stared into the dragon’s eyes and therefore have to be reconnected. I’m hoping the new society will not feel a need to accuse but will instead understand that when someone does something bad they are in fact falling down that trench and may not realise it themselves yet. Our new society should help that person realise they’re descending, and help them reconnect and gain height again. And the best leaders are the ones that teach you to question authority, so I shouldn’t be accusing the future leaders of Earth but rather encourage them to be honourable and lead by good example. We need those kinds of leaders, so that we realise we only rule over our own selves. There should be no more tyranny, but the furious pursuit in prevention of corruption. The dragon must stay in its cage. By removing power and status from leadership roles I think we would make a good effort towards achieving this.
The modern world in which I grew up has many regulating bodies that need to prevent corruption, and bring justice when corruption occurs. Still they can fail and have failed many times. Why the worlds’ persistent corruptions and cover-ups can still exist stems from the fact that if a large part of the population is unaware of all the relevant facts – either partially or entirely – there is no need to reprimand anyone. Regulating authorities seemed to turn a blind eye for payments, and became part of the corruption. For human society to take a step towards progression into a new world, this needs to change. There needs to be absolute transparency about anything concerning power and influence. Leaders, – elders, ideaists, founders, and all other leaders alike – must make this sacrifice in order to keep the demons at bay. The people need to have easy access to this information, and leaders must always be able to take responsibility. No more hidden agendas and secrecy. Secrets obscure view and obstruct judgement. Evil easily resides inside. Secrets are like a loan from honesty. The gain is power, the debt is vulnerability. All debts are collected, sooner or later. Like with most loans, the costs are higher than the gain. We should aim to build our society in such a way the power gain of secrecy cannot grow so there are no debts to collect.
The most important reasons for any governments of different communities to work together is to prevent corruption and to keep peaceful relationships. Trade between regions can be important for resources that are not available everywhere, but we need to put a stop to the mass export of food and products that could also be produced locally at the place we ship them to. We need to cut out the middleman where we can because most of them do nothing but artificially inflate the worth of the product. The only reason why there’s so much trade right now is because labour overseas is way too cheap, and the globalists want us all be dependent on their corporations that facilitate the trade rather than have us discover our self-reliance. Governments may sometimes need to protect us from threats but if the great reset has shown us anything, it is that this can be exploited by evil easily. It is a slippery slope to which extent a government may protect its citizens from threats or even themselves while safeguarding democracy. This is why I think any political position must come with a sworn oath. Any leader should take an oath to serve the individual civilian and not the system, and to help spread enlightenment by being a bringer of light that stays on the light side of the balance.
No politician should be able to claim status from achievements made under their care. They didn’t built anything, there is none of their sweat or blood in whatever was erected or brought down. They’d only come up with the ideas and participated in the debates. For all I care it is them who should remain nameless onlookers, a mere footnote. The only adulation they may receive should be from their measure of humility and decline of being credited and worshipped. The same goes for any other famous person, by the way. Anyone’s opinion should be weighed and considered based on its merits, not by the social status of the person that stated it. Just because someone is a famous artist or actor doesn’t mean their opinion should be valued more than that of anyone else. In fact, I think I can argue that the opinions of famous people in my day and age are the least credible of all when concerning things of every day life, as they are so far removed from the struggles of ordinary people. And we should never forget that opinions do not matter when the highest stakes are about taste. No famous person – just like a politician – is above ridicule or criticism. In fact, good leaders would welcome criticism, and can find laughter and lessons in any ridicule about them made in good taste. We’re so used to politicians that scheme and weasel their way out of critique, but these are the attributes of unfit leaders that should immediately come clean and resign.
Education:
In the society I grew up in, information – or more precisely; the distribution of correct information – is dangerous to those with power over others. The more unwarranted their power is, the more this is dangerous to them. Information can lessen the amount of power they have, or even render them powerless altogether. It is therefore that those in power will put effort in controlling information, putting obstacles in the way of acquiring it, and making sure misinformation is distributed, making it hard for others to know the truth, whether that is because it is indistinguishable in a cloud of misinformation or unobtainable altogether. The truth is becoming more and more important in a world built on lies, and because of this misinformation has become a powerful weapon for the establishment. More powerful than it used to be, because so many more people have access to true information nowadays. Sadly, what is still more powerful is not whether something is true or not, but the amount of people which believes something to be true. But where deceitful lies thread rampantly, truth will eventually reach a point of criticality and become super contagious.
Logic dictates that many of the organisations that process information have evolved to implement a mechanism that can convince large amounts of people something is true, when in fact it is not. Our children go to schools and are partially indoctrinated with false truths because the elites have taken control of many school book publishers. Information is power. This is why they monitor and control it, not just on the internet. In the new society there should be no more positions of power, only positions of privilege. This means information must be able to flow freely in this society. Education should be free, and knowledge shared amongst everybody. In such a society any attempt to mislead the people would fail because the people themselves can sceptically question misinformation and see through any poorly substantiated claims and maliciously false statements. No snake oil salesman will ever stand a chance of doing business in this world, which would be filled with smart and witty people that aren’t gullible and who can actually sceptically interrogate any assertion. To reach that kind of society we desperately need to change our educational systems.
The school system in the west sets children and students up to fail their true potential, while also moulding their mental shape in such a way they all think their failures within the system – as well as outside of it – are actually their fault. These are the perfect workers to accept salary slavery, which is nothing but corporate ownership over the work force. Through salary slavery the hard work of people is bought at a bargain price, cause seldom do workers receive adequate bonuses for efforts that exceed the mandates. Our school systems are places where besides the transference of knowledge and perhaps even wisdom, the minds of our pupils are brainwashed to accept the tyranny of society after they graduate. But deep inside will linger a feeling of being treated unfairly, and some might kindle that flame to go against the system. They will experience an inner conflict, where the self seeks to correct this lingering feeling of injustice. Because they have been in the school system since a very young age, most of them will not be able to properly identify the culprit, and the system has a safety net in place for those that do. The many activist groups like ‘black lives matter’, ‘feminism’ and other groups claiming to fight for equality are all lightning rods for the establishment to direct anger caused by the system under the influence of the establishment away from the establishment and back onto (other) victims of the system. But this started in the schools.
A sure sign of a healthy educational system is one where students who are free to go to school, choose to go there by default and are truly enjoying it. This would be a system where the students aren’t obligated to go to school, yet do so on their own accords, without any threats or incentives, or any other tricks. One of the problems most of the educational systems of my era suffer from is that we expect a group of unique pupils to learn the same thing at the same time. The criterium for what they are going to have to learn is their collective age, and they must learn the things we offer them and not something else. Another problem is all educational institutes get carried away with putting a grade on all performances. Everything needs to be graded. If we subject children and students to high amounts of tests it hinders their ability to learn. The grade becomes more important than the performance behind that grade. In the old days when a pupil of a Smith grafted their first horse shoe, they weren’t graded; they were commended for their achievement, and encouraged to continue to improve. Today, we obligate individuals to behave like a group and tell them it’s for their individual benefit, which is as ridiculous and contra-effective as it sounds. As with all things concerning systems of people, there are spiritual implications for this way of teaching. I heard a joking statement that goes like this: “The first 5 years of our children’s lives we try to get them to walk and talk, after which we put them in schools were they need to sit down and shut up.” The only reason we find this funny is because it reveals a truth that escaped us, yet we seem unmoved to do something with this revelation.
The truth is that we dehumanise our children through our educational methods of schools. Just look at the first day of school for any child. They are in fear. The child knows something the parent has long forgotten. They see the system for what it is in that moment. Name one other animal in the animal kingdom that leaves their young child in the hands of strangers? It’s barbaric. Children should go to school by choice. The true success of any educational system is difficult to measure, because it stems from the level of joy pupils have in learning. Joy is subjective and difficult to comparatively measure. The less joy the students have in learning, the more the system must compensate for this lack of joy by quantifying the performance of its students, and trying to substitute those grades for what should be the joy of learning something new. This is to say our children do not enjoy learning at school. Yet, from the day we’re born we humans are naturally curious and wish to examine our world and learn anything we can. Small children have a desire to investigate their surroundings. We wish to explore the physical and social aspects of our environment and that drives us to learn to speak and move about. As children we find ourselves in a world completely unexplored, filled with wonders, and we constantly look for answers. “Why is that car blue? Why did that man give that woman a box? Why are these ants gathering on the wall? Why can’t I touch this plant? Why is fire hot?” It is in us to look for the truth.
We want to know. But in school we take that sense of wonder away from our children. We disregard the things they want to know, replacing them with things they must know. And if they can’t find the motivation to learn those things, the system rejects them, and they are deemed stupid or lazy. Only a broken system could come to such conclusions. We should give our children back their freedoms to learn what they wish to learn. An educational system where the height of the grades are more important that the underlying effort will create students that experience the challenges to expand knowledge as discouragements to progress their study. The grades should be subjective to the effort but the effort isn’t quantifiable while the grades are. There is a discrepancy between these two. Only when we’ll put the effort ahead of the grade in our educational systems will we see students that will focus on that which is the only thing of importance in any educational institute; learning to expand knowledge, opposed to learning to get a good grade.
Of course, the school systems I grew up in and even work in right now are designed with finances in mind. A school is a method to spare expenses. Something could be said for this, but I think it ultimately fails us in the long run. A society with highly educated and highly motivated citizens will render plenty of income to finance schools properly to provide for individual study paths. I’d say let school-going children be free to learn what they want to learn. If they want to learn physics, they’ll soon find they need to understand mathematics first. Let them choose their own paths. If the motivation comes from within and not outside they won’t need years, but will learn quickly. It is in our nature. And perhaps most things to learn will come from their social environment. Is it really normal that I as a science teacher am the one to tell my students about photosynthesis because their own parents can’t explain it? Shouldn’t we all know how our language is spoken and written correctly, so not just our teachers? Shouldn’t we all be able to teach something? I think everyone is a teacher in their own right, but just doesn’t realise this because the school system once deemed us unfit in many subjects and so our talents became cloaked under the dark cloud of negative self-perception.
True, in this world there is so much knowledge to know, we can’t possibly know all. We’ll have to choose a direction. But I think right now most people don’t know things I would consider basic stuff, while our heads are filled with garbage as if it’s important. Our curricula have to change. Why don’t children learn about their rights? What about teaching them the basics to survive in the wild? Or just how to cook a few meals? These are just some examples on which I think education should not be lacking. Essential things are missing in the curricula of our schools. And I hope you understand I would also want to make a big point about teaching our children about spirituality. This might be a hard sell to those that read this in my day and age, but I hope future generations can see the necessity of it. It is imperative our children learn to stay spiritually serene. We need to teach them to be genuine individuals. We need to be genuine people ourselves first. If we can find a way to become genuine in everything we do we will raise children who are completely and truly genuine.
We need to teach our children about self-exploration. This shouldn’t start in schools but should be the aim for our entire society. We need everyone in our society to maintain an inner dialogue. In order to teach this we need to get an inner dialogue going ourselves first. Our children must know what an inner dialogue is and how it helps them be more grounded, self-aware, and confident, and how this will keep their souls as pure as their spirits. This inner dialogue is possibly the single most important thing any human should master. It is a skill that is never fully learned. We can only get infinitely better at it while time goes by. It is not something you learn and never forget, like riding a proverbial bicycle. It is a skill that needs constant training. Instead of seeing this as training we should change our perspective of it to seeing it as a way of life. If you are on a diet every single day of your life you grow accustom to it and it becomes normal. The same thing should apply to us having an inner dialogue. It will help us keep the demons at bay and recognise evil when it manifests.
New generations shouldn’t be forbidden to live life like the old before the cataclysm of evil. We should instead allow them to choose a better society themselves, by describing in detail how people used to live – careless about their souls – and how their live style impacted their environment. We should make sure the next generations understand the evil that resides in all of us, and show what it grew into by our combined negligence in our soulless efforts. We should cultivate just enough evil so we can understand it. Evil is an undeniable part of this world. We cannot cast it out ourselves. Not without divine help. We need to be able to understand it. To know without context is to fall under the control of the devil. To know within context is to peek into the mind of God and aspire to understand him. We should offer our children this context to the best of our abilities. The coming apocalypse is most definitely one of humanity’s most educational experiences. I am confident there is a chance – however slim – we can dose it in such a way we can learn from it while not letting ourselves be poisoned by it, and maybe actually acquire immunity from it.
Our liberation from evil is without any doubt to be found in creativity. Music, dance, stories, and any artistic expression you could possibly think of will drive away the demons back into the abyss. To express yourself creatively is to consult with God and in your creation you will find his answers. Art invokes a response, as well as in the artists as in their audience. This response awakens something within us. Art should take a much bigger stage in our schools, viewed from the perspective of what art can do for our souls spiritually. Though no student or pupil should ever be forced to participate in the creation or observation of it. We know exactly which art we like and which we don’t. Creation of art comes naturally from within and we may not yet recognise the art in every which way our youngest may express themselves. We must rest assured that art takes many forms. All we need to do is guide them to see the meaning in their artistic creations and help them understand the relation of their creations to their inner journey. They need to understand why certain art appeals to them and why they wanted to create what they created. People with a strong inner dialogue should have no problem seeing and following the spiritual paths their creations reveal to them.
This will also stimulate their creativity and imagination. This is very important to reaching our empathic potential as human beings. Since it is hard for us humans to learn from other people’s mistakes it is imperative we nourish and expand the imagination of our children, for imaginative people are the wisest individuals. Only people with a strong vivid imagination can imagine a mistake and learn from it, without ever having to make the mistake. People without imagination are dull, boring buffoons, void of charisma and character. There is no doubt that one of the most valuable skills you should learn in school is to not remake previous mistakes.
In the next chapter I will continue what I started in this chapter.
~reckneya