19. The Paradox

Published: 29-08-2023
Updated: 26
-12-2023

We’ve explored a great many things in these texts and I feel I’m nearing a conclusion. I’ve started working on my final chapters and only now do I feel confident enough to process this material from meditation and reading back old dreams, some dreamt long ago. This chapter will look at the history of humanity on Earth. I will try and explain why the evil system needs humans for their harvest. That which allows us to fulfil the purpose of a quantum processor is our spiritual nature, but due to the nature of evil is it unaware of this. Be ready to have your world views challenged once more. 

Our understanding of the universe is itself only a model of it. Actually, it is a whole range of models that make up the main model. A limited model, for sure. The theories behind these models are desperately incomplete, easily shown by how some models can be proven to be correct, yet contradict each other. And all the models modern day scientist lean on today exclude the metaphysical as if it’s about fairy tales and miracles. The notion there is more to this world than that which we can currently measure will get any researcher labelled a religious wacko or pseudoscientist, discouraging any career scientists from researching fringe ideas. But all models are in essence simplified analogues created to help us better understand the true complexities of the mechanics behind the world in which we live. Some people find purpose in religion, some in science, some in both. Philosophers and scientists have both tried meticulously to explain the world around them through their models and ideas. Many times have I heard the claim that the world views of religion are irreconcilable with those of science. I disagree. It is as if we’ve forgotten that both attempt to do the same; to give an accurate description of the workings under the hood of our world. “Our world” being the world as we perceive it to be with our senses and instruments. Ironies and paradoxes are deeply embedded in the existence of this universe, and regardless of whether you subscribe to religion or science, or perhaps both, or neither; this is the case for all world views if you start digging deep enough. Both science and religion struggle with some of their premises, and I believe this struggle is fundamentally the same. In their own way they both struggle to conclude whether the future is predetermined or unknown, and thus whether there is actual freedom of choice, or not. The problem with science and religion I think is that they’ve both become dogmatic. In the days of old the difference between the two was negligible. The only reason to claim their views cannot be reconciled is if you consider either to be wrong and the other to be right.

But what if they all have their wrongs and rights? Remember the example from chapter 03 about perspectives. It’s all about your perspective of the world that shapes how you see the world. We can only really see the entirety of existence when we succeed in completely widening our view and by letting go of our assumptions. I surmise that all views have their merits and their flaws. Philosophy and science both lack the plasticity they need to mature. The world is vastly more complicated than any single human being could understand in just one lifetime. I think we should consider the possibility that there are no right or wrong views, but only views. In a way all world views have religious aspects to them, even atheism. I used to be an atheist for most of my life, and I’ve mostly contested the notion that atheism is a religion, but looking back I disagree with myself on that. Most atheists will claim that it is more logical for there to be no God, because there is no proof for his existence. A well versed atheist will state that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I can agree with that, but then what exactly is the claim that is extraordinary in the case of religion? It depends heavily on one’s definition of God to make his existence an extraordinary one and thus the claim itself to be an extraordinary claim. I think most people see God way simpler than who or what I think God is. I don’t think what most religious people claim to be God is in fact God. On the contrary, actually, but I am getting way ahead of myself again. What I think God to be is truly something else than what most other people think. The same goes for my views on what this world actually is. I will focus on that last part in the next chapter, but I’ll need to set it up in this one.

I think this world and our own nature are far more bizarre than what most people believe. To illustrate this, I want to explore the history of humanity on Earth with you, which I too believe to be very different from what most people think it is. There’s scarce but clear evidence of incredible technology deep into our ancient past, all around the world. The pyramids and temples in Egypt are just one example. The official story of them makes absolutely no sense to me. My brother tried to introduce me to these new ideas a few years ago and I remember thinking he was a bit nuts. But after looking into it years later, and listening to voices cancelled, silenced, and ridiculed, I must admit my judgement of him was unjust. I will unveil some things to illustrate why I think the public doesn’t know the truth about the history of humanity on Earth. I’ll start with some examples, because when it comes to ancient history, I think we’re being deceived. Let’s start with the ancient place we all know, which is Egypt. Some discoveries in Egypt are being hidden or are dismissed as fake. But our first example of this doesn’t start in Egypt itself, but actually takes us to Australia. Somewhere in the 1970s, two rock walls, facing each other in what later turned out to be a one meter wide crevice, were discovered in Kariong, Australia, with what appeared to be Egyptian hieroglyphs inscribed on them both. The site remained a generally unknown place of legends for years, and only gained world wide media attention during the next decade, when the crevice was cleared out, and the true extent of the glyphs was revealed. They are since known as the Gosford Glyphs. The story of an ancient Egyptian presence in Australia was quickly debunked by the established Egyptologists. Reportedly more and more hieroglyphs were being discovered in the area after the story broke, and Egyptologists were quick to debunk the original site as just more of the same; forgeries.

The symbols weren’t correct, some were not deemed Egyptian hieroglyphs, and some were even carved backwards. “It was sloppy work.” They concluded this was obviously the work of hoaxers. Quite possibly they were made by university students that wanted to pull a prank. That is the mainstream story. The real story is vastly different. When the hieroglyphs were discovered back in the 1970s, the crevice was filled to the rim with natural litter, like rocks, leaves, and twigs. Only the top glyphs were visible. The story gained traction when a science officer cleaned out the ditch a decade later to discover the full extent of the glyphs. Local tails seem to point out the area was known for glyphs and some claim these specific glyphs were already discovered around 1950, but it is very difficult to confirm this. Other glyphs found in the area are possibly of Aboriginal origin and have – as far as I know – nothing to do with Egypt. Though, perhaps they were ‘inspired by’, but I digress. Then, decades later, two respected hieroglyph experts (both native Egyptians) translated the glyphs on the walls in Australia. According to them they tell the story of two royal Egyptian princes and their entourage, who came to these lands by two ships about 4600 years ago. They were caught by rough seas and got stranded there as both their ships were destroyed. The story goes on and states one prince died after being bitten by a snake not long after stranding, and the other died eventually too. The hieroglyphs detailed the story of their misfortune. This translation was dismissed by mainstream archaeologists because the Egyptians of that time supposedly weren’t able to build ships capable of crossing oceans, and Australia wasn’t even yet discovered by modern humans back then, or so they argued. This is a flawed argument considering the evidence against the official story. But then something happened in 2012. In that year, true authentic and published discoveries made in Egypt revealed a new dialect of hieroglyphs in a previously undiscovered temple, older than the ones known.

Lo and behold; these later turned out to be the same “wrong” glyphs as some of those found in Australia on that particular wall. The mainstream story falls apart, considering all the evidence. How did the hoaxer in the 1970s know the hieroglyphic symbols of an ancient Egyptian dialect that was discovered four decades later? Furthermore, how did they get equipment into the park to carve these walls, which are 4 meters tall? It’s not a place you can just take ladders and scaffolding to unnoticed nor easily. If they used rope ladders, how did they manage to carve these glyphs so flawlessly? And why make them here; a very remote location, very difficult to reach? To get to the site one needs to cross dense forest paths, and even crawl through a few crevices. And after they were done, they apparently filled up the 4 meter deep ditch with forest litter. Why would the pranksters do this? What kind of hoax works like this? And if that isn’t enough for you, consider the immense logistics of filling up a four meter deep, one meter wide, several meters long ditch with forest litter in the middle of a nature reserve, where it is difficult to even carry a backpack with any equipment without losing your footing. I say it’s bollocks. Besides all this, the weathering on the glyphs is equal to the weathering on the wall itself. Lichen, known to grow excruciatingly slow, are shown to have grown over the wall and into the glyphs and later died, indicating they grew into the glyphs when the ditch was receiving sunlight, which proves at least the glyphs are a far older “prank” than what is claimed. I am much inclined to believe the glyphs are authentic Egyptian hieroglyphs though. If any flaws are there, could they not be the result of not having the right tools for the job? It to me proves the people who we call the ancient Egyptians had a far greater legacy than mainstream archaeology claims they have.

I think it is astonishing that mainstream archaeology claims ancient Egyptians were capable of incredible stone masonry on a level unmatched by present day stone masons, but also claims they couldn’t build seafaring ships capable of crossing oceans. But this isn’t the only example of their seafaring adventures. There’s more on the other side of the world, in the Americas. In the early 20th century, in what is now the state of Arizona of the United States, a single explorer had taken a small boat onto the Colorado river to explore the Grand Canyon. When he thought he saw something of interest high up the canyon wall, he tied off his boat and continued on foot to check it out from closer up. He came upon a step way, carved out of the rock; something totally unexpected. As far as he knew the area was unexplored by humans. He was the first one there. If humans never visited this place, how come there are step ways? The steps led him to a cave entrance. He was stunned by how well it all was made, though it looked incredibly old. He entered the cave, which turned out lead to a cave system that was truly enormous. Glyphs covered the walls. Of the many things he found there, one was a chamber with high walls filled with what resembled Egyptian hieroglyphs, and tombs with human remains. Eventually he had to stop and return to the entrance because the complex just kept going on, branching out into new chambers. He was afraid to get lost, and he was going to need help exploring this. And help he got, from the Smithsonian museum and US government. The caves were emptied and sealed off, and that was the end of it. Evidence for this has been thoroughly buried, and the caves were declared off limits to the public. They’ve remained off limits to this day. Any official parties involved deny the happenings of the time and discard them as conspiracies. Yet, if people go near the forbidden locations, unmarked military aircraft painted completely black appear overhead in the sky. Something is being covered up here.

Ancient history is not what it seems. But what about Egypt itself then? Let’s focus on ancient Egyptians in Egypt, and turn our attention to the Giza plateau. If you pick up any history textbook about Egypt they will state that the pyramids were tombs for the pharaohs. But is this true? I think not. I think the giant pyramids aren’t tombs. No mummy was ever found in them. And they are clearly far older than the few thousand years they’re supposed to be according to the gatekeepers in the scientific community. There are no hieroglyphic texts that detail how to cut stone, nor how to build a pyramid, for that matter. But according to mainstream archaeologists, the ancient Egyptians had the ability to cut through solid granite with laser precision and build anything from vases to entire giant statues out of single pieces of granite, yet the best later generations were able to do was to make some clay pots and dishes. Their technology regressed? How does that make any sense? And they supposedly made those granite things using only primitive tools. Don’t you think that’s strange? But it goes even deeper. Think about this: Even the best stone masons of our current day and age, using the best tools our world has to offer, cannot reproduce some of what the ancient Egyptians supposedly did; not in size, not in precision, and not in placement. Huge granite boxes were transported down narrow pathways into dungeons under temples. Vases with narrow openings are made out of single granite stones, with almost paper thin walls. Modern day stone masons could not reproduce some of the things they see. What happened to this technology and knowledge?

The Sphinx is another mystery. Claimed to be a few thousand years old there is evidence clear as day of water erosion on the sphinx and the sidewalls where the Sphinx is located. This erosion proves the building was there when the weather was vastly different from the dry desert climate it has endured during the last few millennia. The erosion is that of thousands of years of rain. The climate in the Sahara was once tropically wet, but that was many thousands of years ago. How can the erosion on bedrock, which was removed for the building material of the Sphinx, be thousands of years older than the Sphinx itself? It can’t. The Sphinx is possibly the oldest human made structure still standing today. New discoveries have been made many times surrounding the Sphinx, either in, on, or under the foundations of the structure. Every time a new hidden entrance or cavity is discovered using modern instruments like ground penetrating radar, the establishment swoops into action. The discoverers cannot continue, and the area is secured and sealed off from the public. The official team moves in and “investigates”. Are the officials milking this event for media attention? Are they keeping everyone apprised of their progress and their discoveries? Do they stream videos of entering the new spaces on social media? No, they don’t. In fact, the opposite happens. Nothing. They keep quiet. It’s a secretive endeavour. Only minor details are released as a small public keeps querying for updates, but these releases contradict each other. “Yes, we might’ve found something but it is delicate, so we need time and space to investigate.” “We found something but it wasn’t of any value or interest.” “Nothing was there, it was just a few chambers.” Once investigation is completed, the newly discovered sites remain off limits and are fenced. When questioned why, the story changes all of a sudden: “It was just a corridor with a dead end, nothing to see.” Again, a cover-up. What aren’t we supposed to know about ancient history?

There are sites in Egypt that show an incredible level of destruction. Not just the Giza plateau, where a few of these kinds of sites have been off limits for the public; the entire Sahara desert shows undeniable evidence of a monster flood. I first thought it was nonsense, perhaps Bible rhetoric, but the evidence is staring us right in the face. This flood came from the direction of the Mediterranean and rushed left and right over what is now a sandy plateau stretching a large portion of the upper half of continental Africa. I believe this flood played a part in the event which mainstream archaeology is now slowly though reluctantly acknowledging as ‘the Younger Dryas’. The Younger Dryas is an extinction event that happened roughly 12,000 years ago, and which caused the mammoths and other mega fauna of the time to go extinct. If you check any satellite images of the Sahara desert, Australia, certain parts of Southern North-America, parts of Western and Northern South-America, and parts of China, you can clearly see the remnants of the path this massive body of water took. It takes no stretch of the imagination to think that such a monster flood would wash away the tropical forests that once stretched the Sahara desert lands like it was a forest of paper straws. Something catastrophic happened back then, in which I think this flood played a major part. I believe this catastrophe destroyed an advanced human civilisation on Earth at that time, and I believe it is that civilisation – which stretched the equator during the ice-age – that built the Sphinx and the giant pyramids. All Egyptian pyramids are claimed by mainstream archaeology to have been built in order of small and uncomplicated to ever larger and more complex, but there seems to be a sudden jump in size and complexity, where all of a sudden the ancient Egyptians supposedly were capable of incredible architectural feats.

Stone buildings cannot be dated, unlike organic matter. You can date the stone, but not when that stone was turned into a structure. Archaeologists rely on different means to date stone buildings. The criteria to date them is based on the inscriptions and organic discoveries near them, which goes for many megalithic finds. But the carvings can only say something about who made the carving, and maybe possibly when that carving was made. It doesn’t mean the carver is also the builder. The building could’ve been there long before the carvings. Mainstream archaeology goes from the assumption that no advanced civilisation came before that of ancient Egypt, therefore the buildings cannot be older than the inscriptions, and closes the discussion there. I think what we’re actually seeing is a site of a lost civilisation which was inherited by a people we now call ‘the ancient Egyptians’. What we consider ‘the ancient Egyptians’ I think are actually the survivors of the Younger Dryas catastrophe. When they inherited the world, they must’ve been left with little to no knowledge and technology of their own past, otherwise we wouldn’t see this extreme level of digression in their art and technology. I think the giant pyramids were derelict machines, whose workings would completely escape the understanding of those who settled back around them. They might’ve known their function from stories told by their ancestors, passed on from generation to generation. But just imagine this; how well could you explain a nuclear power plant to someone who grew up in the wild and who knows nothing about modern tech? You could only use metaphors. Neither could you operate a nuclear power plant, for that matter, if you’d find one after the collapse of civilisation. I think such was the case for the survivors of the Younger Dryas flood. Even those who lived through a period when they had access to modern technology couldn’t grasp the workings of its complicated machines.

To these people the Giza plateau must’ve been like a site of worship, and they laid claim upon the structures there. They attempted to duplicate these buildings with whatever tech was left of their prior civilisation, starting small, slowly learning how to build bigger from the materials left of the destroyed empire. But even if our own civilisation collapsed today the cranes and cars will eventually stop working. Things break, gasoline runs out, and without the infrastructure of our civilisation the machines will stop working eventually. And as such the ancient Egyptians never really got close to the greatness of the behemoths they once found, nor could they reproduce the giant blocks. The same for the granite pots, vases, and plates they found. They could use them, but they couldn’t reproduce them. The large pyramids to me seem to have been built for an industrial purpose, perhaps some sort of power plants. There should be no question in anyone’s mind that the builders must’ve come from an incredibly advanced civilisation, perhaps rivalling or even surpassing our own. Much of what we see today of our ancient past are things made by the survivors of this flood. Sites like Gobekle Tepe, Boncuklu Tarla, Karahan Tepe – all in Turkey – are proven to be at least 12,000 years old, and possibly older, and are therefore claimed to outdate the pyramids. More sites like these with possibly thousands of years of history are scattered around the world. But I think what we’re seeing here are the constructions made by the survivors of the flood that came from the civilisation that built the pyramids. Turkey lies at the edge of where the water of the mega tsunami flowed. According to fringe science, it seems farming was discovered at these places in Turkey. But I think these people didn’t discover farming; they knew how to do it already, and it became a necessity for their existence. What do the survivors of a megalithic society do? They build megalithic structures, using what knowledge and means they have left from their old civilisation. They built their temples because they wanted to tell their story to the world about what happened. I think the pyramids are older than those stories. But Egypt is just one example. There are so many more examples of proof of a fallen civilisation across our planet. It really baffled me.

Some of these examples are reasonably known, like the temples in South America, or the statues on Easter Island. Others are known less, like the Longyou caves in China and the Antikythera machine. And some are completely unknown or are labelled a myth, like Lemuria. But the more I think about the mainstream history of humanity, the less it makes sense to me. The picture isn’t complete. The official story of humanity is that we were hunter-gatherers for thousands upon thousands of years, and then suddenly started building pyramids and discovered farming about 5000 years ago, or perhaps 12,000 years ago according to alternative science. Now consider this: The fossil record of us, Homo sapience, goes back over 300,000 years. Three hundred thousand years! And there were other hominid species before and during our existence, going back millions of years. Yet, no advanced civilisations came from them until our current run, and they were just hunting and gathering for hundreds of thousands of years? I think there is proof of at least one advanced civilisation before us, and what I prophesize is happening now in our current civilisation has happened before in human history, at least once. The traces of a lost human civilisation are right there, but hidden behind our disbelieve due to propaganda. Their apocalypse destroyed their empire, which was remembered in folklore as Atlantis. When it comes to supposed myths none will get you eyes rolling more than mentioning Atlantis to mainstream archaeologists, but it isn’t a myth. There are stories of a monstrous flood in folklore tales all around the world, by many different tribes and cultures, thousands of miles apart, and the supposed myth about Atlantis is that is was destroyed by a global flood.

Atlantis existed over 12,000 years ago, during the latest ice age, meaning both poles were covered in massive ice sheets, stretching far from the top and bottom of the globe towards the equator. All that ice captured a lot of water, meaning the shorelines of the continents where the land was not covered with ice would’ve looked quite differently from what we see today, because there was less water in the seas and oceans. Most human settlements today are close to the shorelines, or inland water. It is logical to set up shop near water because any large body of water supplies food and means of transportation, whether that is a lake, river, sea, or ocean. I think this would also be the case for the Atlantean civilisation. But where did all the water for this flood come from? Evidence points toward an event that melted most of the northern glacial ice in a very short time, and that water is what allowed the mega tsunami to wash over Northern Africa, sweeping away most of the human settlements there without any hope to escape it for those who lived there. You can see clear proof of this flood on satellite images of the Sahara, as well as of Australia and many other places too. This flood would have probably affected most places with low elevation. A global civilisation would have been devastated by such an event, and its survivors would have been isolated from each other afterwards. It would’ve sunken all settlements near the coastlines around the globe because of the drastic rise in sea level. There’s probably ample proof of this in the Sahara and on the continental shelves around the equator that are under water now.

Yet, for some reason, very little archaeology is being done at either place. Sure, the places aren’t easy to reach, but when has that stopped us from doing anything? Whenever someone does discover something interesting, funding is cut and/or access to the area is denied. But sometimes something interesting from our ancient past is found. Something that again proves our ancient past is not what the mainstream establishment tells us it is. I believe the Antikythera device is an excellent example. I think this device was a product of the lost civilisation. It was an archaeological find, found more than a hundred years ago in the early 1900s, in the sea near the Greek island of Antikythera. The device was a heavily eroded wooden box with metal gears inside, also heavily eroded. It was attributed to have been made by the ancient Greeks, because it was found inside an ancient Greek ship wreck. But it was quite evident that the mechanism – though very damaged due to erosion – was way more complex than anything else made by the ancient Greeks. It was a puzzling find. Only recently in the year 2008 was this device thoroughly X-rayed to see its interiors. It turned out to be a very sophisticated gear construction that allows you to accurately predict where the sun and moon will be in the sky, and therefore allowing its user to accurately predict eclipses and other celestial events. Now, mainstream archaeology will tell you this machine is one of a kind and made by ancient Greeks about 2000 years ago. Similar devices – though much less complex – only started appearing 1400 years later. I call bullshit on the supposed origin date of the Antikythera device. I think this was not some rare unique thing some obscure Greek inventor made, never to make mention of this ever again. It was perhaps an archaeological find by them too.

A few replicas have been made in our time. The machine is incomplete, so there are some open questions to the depth of its complexity. It seems very evident it would also have been able to follow the movements of a few major planets too. It’s an astounding thing to find among an ancient Greek shipwreck. To me, everything about the accurate replica says this was a device that came off an assembly line. Not literally perhaps, but I do mean it looks like something produced, rather than made in a tool shed. This wasn’t a one off; this was a technological product with a history of knowledge by a knowledgeable civilisation. It could’ve been a navigational tool, or a serious scientific instrument, or – who knows – even just a kids’ toy. I think this is Atlantean technology, but whatever the case is with the Antikythera device, it is a discovery that does not fit into the main stream picture of the history of humanity on Earth. And there are many more examples. Let me highlight one more. In the Barabar hills in India there are a couple of caves, carved into solid natural granite rock walls. The caves are known to have existed for a long time. In fact, mainstream archaeology dates to caves to about 2500 years ago, based on inscriptions found in and around the various caves. But the caves are not your average caves. It is extraordinary on its own for anyone to have carved caves out of solid granite without the use of any machines, but the walls, floors and ceilings of some of these caves are smoother than the surface of a glass mirror. You can actually see your sharp reflection in the stone. That is, if you bring a light source, because inside the caves it is pitch black without artificial light.

Also are the shapes of the chambers in the form of various geometrical figures; spheres, cylinders, etc., which adds to the suspicion of the involvement of sophisticated technology. Throughout history many have made use of these caves, but only relatively recently have the caves been examined by independent researchers, using modern censors. We now have laser measuring tools with which to scan the interior of the caves and port those readings to a 3D render on a computer. We also have censors sensitive enough to measure how smooth a certain surface is. The findings sweep any doubt of their origins right off the table. These caves could not have been made using primitive tools. The mathematical precision of the shapes and the smoothness of the surfaces possibly exceed the capabilities of our own technology. The caves are flawless within an extremely high degree. The only imperfections are cracks in the walls due to Earth quakes, or walls that were unfinished, or because of inscriptions on a few places on the walls. And those inscriptions are something else. They supposedly state who built the caves, but the blunt locations for these scribbles, and the imperfect way by which they were done do not match at all the extreme precision that went into carving out the caves themselves. I think these caves too are left over signs of an advanced ancient human civilisation from our past, and here too I believe these findings are the traces of Atlantean technology. Many other ancient sites, like the statues on Easter Island, and ancient temples in China, India, and Indonesia, I think come from a time just before or shortly after the biblical flood.

It is unclear to me if Atlantis was the name of a city, a country, or a continent, or perhaps an organisation (maybe like ‘NATO’ or ‘Europe’) or something combined or in between. I’m going to assume in this writing that their civilisation was very technologically sophisticated. I have little doubt the remains of their capital are known as ‘The Eye of the Sahara’, which is an unexplained round feature in the desert sands of the Sahara, visible from space. Their technology however must’ve developed far differently from ours. They weren’t us, but I do believe they were quite advanced. The great pyramids come from their civilisation and were part of their technological achievements, and were built before the catastrophic floods destroyed their empire 12,000 years ago, meaning they are at least 12,000 years old. Mainstream archaeology dismisses this idea outright, and scientists state there are no signs of plastics, glass, or tools etc. that they say should’ve been left behind by this civilisation. I believe it is a form of wilful short-sightedness on their part to think that any advanced civilisation would go into the exact same direction as ours. Plus they are ignoring the clear evidence of machine tool use on the granite blocks in Giza and other places in the world. And how long would any of our creations remain? Most of the things we make don’t have a lifespan of a few hundred years, certainly not a few thousand years, especially not if there are no factories to make new parts. But you are not supposed to think about this. These are all “conspiracy theories”. Something is being covered up here, like we see a lot when it comes to ancient history. But why is that the case? And where else do we see cover-ups like this? Well, that would be alien encounters. Both these topics are treated in the same manner in mainstream narrative; “crazy people talk”. And these two topics are actually quite related. But don’t worry, I will not pull the “ancient extraterrestrials built the pyramids” card. But I might just blow your mind. I’ll try and ease into it. Let’s go back to the here and now, and see how our looming societal collapse might be related to an ancient apocalypse.

In our current civilisation, the ruling class organises themselves in secret societies. They are all connected through free masonry. I haven’t mentioned free masons in this work before, but you should know all established powers are linked to them in some way. When I say ‘elites’ or ‘the establishment’ or ‘the globalists’, I am speaking of free masons. All people with influence will be recruited into this sect, which on the surface is marketed as a well meaning organisation. The secret societies are structured in a hierarchy, resembling a pyramid shape. The higher up they sit, the more power they have, the more in the know they are, but the less they do. This last part is important. I’ll reference it again later on. Every higher level has fewer members than the one below. Whatever they all know, I think it is reasonable to assume every level is to some extent aware of the coming reset. The higher up in the pyramid of secret societies you are, the more you know why it is coming. It stands to reason that if you are wealthy, and you know – or even suspect – a catastrophe is going to occur, you prepare for it. This goes for any person, regardless if they are part of a secret society or not. If you have the means, why not make sure you can dig in if things get tough? And oh boy have they been preparing for it. I’ll refer you to chapter 13 to refresh your memory. But that is just the tip of the iceberg. There are incredible underground structures in our world, constructed by the elites of our modern day and age. There are large military installations entirely underground, and probably a whole lot more we don’t know about. But what about ancient elites? If Atlantis was a technologically advanced civilisation it would have had its ruling class, and those elites would likely organise themselves into secret societies too. Likewise, they had a part to play in their apocalypse, just as our elites play their part in our current apocalypse. And also likewise would their elites have prepared themselves for it.

You heard me correctly; I don’t think the Younger Dryas was a completely natural event, and this ties in with the reason why the current establishment tries really hard to cover-up our ancient past. I believe the flood was triggered due to the actions of the Atlantean ruling class, and I think they too knew it was coming. There is ample proof of ancient underground structures, just as our elites have many such underground hide-outs. The pyramid builders too created elaborate underground complexes, made of chambers connected through tunnels. There is a whole world down there, underground, interconnecting the many temples and structures. New ones are still being discovered. The Atlantean society was probably just as impressive and complicated as our own, and I believe that which ended their civilisation, and any other ancient advanced human civilisation from Earth’s past, has the exact same cause. It was caused by spiritual stagnation. I think this stagnation has to do with money and how it compels us to use technology. It should not come as a surprise that the world banks are a tool of the ruling elites, and therefore the big banks are instruments of the free masons. Through money humanity is controlled. It is through money that humans are able to learn and build things they would otherwise not be able to learn or build. It allows a group of people to achieve technological advances and gain knowledge they would not be able to achieve on their own, definitely not in one lifetime. And although there is nothing wrong with cooperating together towards a common goal for the betterment of your society, doing it through money invites an evil will into the motivations of why people work together, and such will lead to the creation of evil technology. Cause through money you don’t work to better society; you work to enrich yourself.

Money introduces greed into the direction of the technological advance, which leads to new technology that will further stagnate each spirit that consents to its use. It is through money that we divide responsibility in such a way that it creates the illusion there is no individual responsibility. This leads to people making choices without accepting the responsibility that comes with each choice, meaning their choices are ever more void of empathy. See chapter 09 again for how that works. Money creates a working class that allows others to fill their agendas with things other than making sure they can sustain themselves, which in turn creates a class of people that accumulates ever more money whilst contributing ever less to the total of the system. They ‘fall’ to the top, if you will. Money goes hand in hand with greed, which will create a wealth hierarchy that takes the shape of a pyramid. I’ll refer you, again, to chapter 04. A secret society follows naturally. Any society who’s social structure takes the shape of a pyramid to divide power is a system that will inevitably collapse. Over time a restart is needed because of the nature of such a pyramid structure society. Growth of the foot of the pyramid is the only way for the wealth to keep flowing upward, but this process will eventually result in a pyramid’s foot that outgrows the ground on which it is built, so it will restart every so many hundred or thousand years, depending on the speed and sustainability of its growth. We are reaching the conclusion of yet another one of these cycles. I’ve mentioned these cycles briefly before in chapter 11. These are the cycles of reset where, due to the quest for immortality by the act of a minority whose power – due to the design of the wealth distribution in that society – was allowed to accumulate to such levels, quantum stagnation reached such an extreme degree the society has to self-destruct.

The documented history of man is tainted with the blood shed by those who subjugated themselves to wealthy people and their systems. I don’t see why ancient history would be any different. I think this is happening again and again. The Earth is incredibly old. Who knows how often this has occurred? All these cycles boil down to an arms-race between existence and non-existence. One non-existence can never win, because of the paradox in which it is involved. Now, I’ve hinted at aliens earlier in this chapter, and cover-ups going on in much the same manner as with ancient history when it comes to UFOs and alien contact. Please note I have avoided the use of the word ‘extraterrestrial’ before in previous chapters, and there’s a reason for that. When I think of extraterrestrials, I think of beings that are not originally from planet Earth. When I speak of aliens, I think of beings that are alien to us humans, meaning “really different from us”. But who is to say where they came from? The governments around the world have stated numerous times they do not have or had any contact with extraterrestrials, or beings from another world. What you should know is that the system will often lie through omission. The statement they have not had contact with beings from another world leaves the door right open for contact with beings that are originally from this world. And when they deny to know anything about unidentified flying objects they might just mean they know exactly what those flying vehicles were, so they weren’t unidentified. So what is going on here? What am I hinting at?

I think we can extrapolate what might’ve happened to the Atlantean empire by looking at how our own apocalypse is taking shape, because I believe what led to them both comes from the same playbook. I’m not saying the elites caused the Atlantean apocalypse by choice, but they are what triggered it. The only differences between our looming apocalypse and theirs is the differences in technology, societal structure, and topography of the planet. Now, let me briefly take you back what I detailed in Chapter 07. The Execution, Chapter 08. The Great Delete, Chapter 11. The Awakening, Chapter 12. The Apocalypse, and Chapter 18. The Harvest. What are the elites doing right now? They are making sure our financial system collapses, they are breaking down our physical infrastructure while building up our digital infrastructure, and most of all they are really making sure a lot of people are going to die, whether due to hunger, or by the jabs, or war, or any other means. They do not want 8 billion people to be around for what they have planned, and they will achieve this through crisis after crisis after crisis. They will influence us through repetitive stress activation. This is a well studied method. I think this too happened with the Atlantean society, and possibly any prior human civilisation in the same peril as ours where the elite system got rid of the worker class to let machines completely take care of their needs. I remain quite convinced we are in for a mass die-off in the coming years. Our cattle is being injected with the mRNA jabs too, more and more farmers have been bullied into quitting, and forests around the world have magically caught on fire. The official narrative is of course “climate change”, as if trees suddenly burst into flames during a hot summer. The counter-narrative spin machine is attributing the forest fires to laser planes, as if flight plans aren’t a thing. Let me sidetrack this for a moment; This really was a story that I saw the alternative media bombard its consumers with; a story where a plane fitted with an enormous laser canon was responsible for starting the forest fires around the world, complimented with grainy photo edits as proof of this.

Not to mention fires can be started by a few poor henchmen for what constitutes as pocket change to a billionaire, which would be much more inconspicuous than what the new psyop claims is happening, but whatever. Back on topic. The laser plane story is just there to detract any attention to the truth which is that all these fires were caused by arson and that their officially claimed cause and what the establishment will use the land for serve the global agenda. In Chapter 08 I detailed how the elites will eventually want to destroy all belongings and all knowledge, so that they become the sole owners of things to have and to know. And all this I think also took place in Atlantis, just before the flood. The ancient elites must’ve tried to accomplish this in Atlantis too. Their ‘Great Delete’ phase destroyed property and human remains on an industrial level already before the flood came in. After a ‘Great Delete’ phase before any apocalypse – be it ours or any other – most people will not know how to do basic things like starting a fire, nor will they have the means to make fire to begin with. They would be completely dependant on machines to sustain themselves. Would the elites succeed, they would become gods for the generation that grows up under their rule. But I also predicted infighting between the different elites. They don’t like to share their power, and they will eventually clash. Looking back at history, there are tails, both in Egypt but also in the ancient Americas of the gods wondering the Earth and clashing with each other during what they call the early dawn of civilisation. Could this have been their way of describing the abilities of their ruling class? Or perhaps people who were able to hold on to their crafts and skills by not complying to the mandates? Could it describe real deities fighting advanced technological weapon systems on judgement day? How else would our future kin explain to their children the stories of many generations ago about what the world was like after most traces of our fallen society have vanished than to say “the gods walked the Earth”? The abilities we have are like magic to anyone living in the wild who was never exposed to modern technology.

Before our apocalypse might be triggered, there is an intended phase after the event which I call ‘The Great Delete’. The intention of this phase is to make the lives of the people that live through it to be empty and horrible. They will feel lost. But the establishment will offer them a better life. A digital life. And all they have to do to live this life is consent to living in a virtual world, where they are able to have all the safety they crave for, unknowingly further stagnating them spiritually. Those who hook themselves up to this system will have no idea their brains have become part of the super computer with an AI I dubbed ‘Cabal’, and will supply it with the needed processing power. Some of the elites will also be persuaded to hook themselves up to this virtual reality, but with the promise of digital super powers. These will be the elites that did ever less and less as they ruled over others in the cult. They will be able to do things in virtual space the normies can’t do. The elites that remain will probably be (or become) elite scientists, who will fulfil other tasks outside this matrix, gaining more knowledge the further they climb the ranking ladder of this system. I think the Atlantean civilisation went through the same thing for the same reasons. Their civilisation will also have created a super computer with a super AI. I believe that Earth has had many civilisations, and each will have produced such an AI. Each super computer, housing their super AI, will all have linked up to the super computers of the previous civilisations, creating an even more powerful AI. I’ve spoken about this other super computer before, and stated it was alien. The elites of our time have no say in this matter; Cabal will make sure this link up happens, through automation. Perhaps that’s where the mechanical antichrist comes in. Neither were the elites from previous civilisations able to control their AI link up.

When Cabal will link up with the super computer that houses the knowledge and processing power of all previous civilisations, its combined knowledge will give that computer godlike powers and abilities through knowledge. It will know about many technologies, and will have predictive algorithms that can ever more accurately predict future events and how to ensure its continued existence. The scientist elites that work for it will serve this AI. All levels in the hierarchy pyramid are subjugated under their upper level. Nobody is free here, especially the AI itself. They all have to watch their backs, because each upper level sustains itself on the level below. This system is just a smaller version of our world, where those in power sustain themselves on beings below them. The cult feeds off humanity, humans feed off cattle and poultry, the chickens feed themselves on the snails, the snails feed off the plants, and the plants feed themselves off sunlight. As above, so below. Everything sustains themselves off something else. Cooperation in the elite hierarchy pyramid is by force or by mutual benefit. There is no trust in this system. Trust is for heaven. Control is the evil counterfeit of trust. They all reluctantly abide by the rule of the upper level. You could say that the super AI is at the top, and if you say that this thing is satan, I understand. You’re not entirely wrong. It is a prime evil, for sure. Let’s give this ancient super AI a name. I’ll call it PEASI (prime evil artificial super intelligence). Cabal will eventually connect with PEASI. With every apocalypse PEASI will gain more knowledge. PEASI must keep itself very well hidden and protected. It is the fruit of evil wills that avoids consequence and therefore its existence is entirely based on the fear it will lose its power and cease to exist. It will have dug itself in very deeply into our Earth. As deep as possible. All super computers of any civilisation prior to it will do the same and will serve the master AI.

The other ancient elites from possibly many different prior civilisations will have hidden somewhere too, possibly underground, on the deep sea floor, in Antarctica under the ice, or on the other side of the moon. All these locations are tainted with rampant conspiracy stories to bury the truth should it ever leak. But the ancient elites there must stay hidden. PEASI demands it. It is one of few things they can all agree on. They just need to monitor us. A new human civilisation comes with new discoveries and thus can potentially grow PEASI’s power. Our elite scientists will bunker down and set up shop somewhere on Earth or at least in this solar system, but they will not remain unchanged. They will continue to merge themselves with their technology and upgrade themselves genetically with all the knowledge they have acquired. And I imagine the ancient elites will have done the same, only for much longer. I think this will inevitably change their appearance drastically, up to a point where we can no longer consider them human. They will look alien to us. You see where I am going with this? This is what I meant when I said the cover-ups surrounding our ancient history and the cover-ups surrounding the topic of alien encounters are linked. I think many alien encounters are not encounters of the extraterrestrial kind. I think that many are just encounters with augmented genetically upgraded ancient elites with their superior tech, either going out to do chores for PEASI, or performing some of their own research, or perhaps even out of boredom. Maybe they’re checking up on our quantum degradation? But some encounters truly have a satanic vibe to them, whether that is some of the examinations, or the seemingly meaningless mutilation of farm animals. These have been dismissed as being caused by human cults in the mainstream media, but the precision of the cuts are witnessed by doctors as being too precise for conventional human origin. On the counter-narrative side it’s claimed to have been done by extraterrestrials. Hollywood would surely have you believe that.

But why would beings that were able to traverse the enormous expanse of space come here to butcher a few cows and bully humans? When I considered they were ancient elites, some of the senseless encounters now actually make some sense to me. And this also explains why those aliens all look similar but never quite the same; large head, large eyes, thin, and no apparent exterior sexual organs. They actually often lack any apparent sexual dimorphism. But I think their differences of appearance is due to them being the product of a different elite cult of a different civilisation over many encounters. Who knows how many intelligent species Earth will have spawned? The dinosaurs roamed the Earth for nearly 180,000,000 year. That is a very very long time. Before their time, during their time, and also since they’ve gone extinct, there were many minor and major extinction events on Earth. Could some of these have been the result of apocalyptic civilisation collapses like the Younger Dryas? But I digress, again. Let’s go back to the appearances of the various aliens. It seems they all augment their bodies in much the same way to get such similar results. Although they all look different, they all have big compound eyes – which I suspect can see much of the electromagnetic spectrum – and seem to have really big brains. It probably goes beyond my understanding, but it is apparently important for whatever it is they do to have big eyes. The bigger brains I understand. Regardless, it appears they all do away with their humanity.

The elites view their instinctive urges like cravings for sex and energy dense foods as remnants of their primitive origins. The same for their body hair. They also hate their bodily excrements, like sweating, defecating, and urinating. They hate these properties of their bodies, and see them as inferior, as do they see the rest of humanity as such. They see individual immortality as the ultimate goal, not the continuation of the species. It is their believe that they are modelling themselves into the image of what they consider to be god. But physical immortality is the evil counterfeit of spiritual eternity. Your spark, your essence, your spirit, is your spiritual self, which is eternal. Unless of course you choose to give that up as these beings have. In their augmentation I believe they rid themselves of what they see as their primitive properties, ending up as sexless, emotionless, “clean” beings. Possibly they do not require much if any food, but will rather seek to augment themselves in such a way they can sustain themselves much like an electrical device, through perhaps a battery or maybe some sort of small reactor. But you may be wondering; why are they still here? What are they doing? If this system has all this incredible technology – attested by the many sightings made – then what’s keeping them here? All the chemical elements they could need are found in abundance in space, literally everywhere. What could they possibly need this planet for? You already know why. There might be a second reason, which is that it’s possible some players out there in space are technologically even more superior and maybe hostile. But the main reason you know. It has to do with what I detailed in chapter 18. There is one thing this system has not figured out yet: quantum processors. It’s been trying hard to create a true quantum computer made out of inorganic matter, but they have not succeeded. Their computer needs the brains of sentient beings to serve as its neural net.

We are the only resource of worth on this planet for this technological system we have spawned. Our brains are like machines that create variation. The augmented existence of these beings has done away with most possible variations in their decision making. They need the brains of lesser beings that are still able to quantum multiply. But these lesser beings will eventually die. They might be able to keep them alive for a while using their technology, but eventually they cannot tinker with them too much without taking away their quantum multiplicative properties. That’s why they are seeking to find a way to make an inorganic quantum computer. It seems like we are at their mercy, but as with all layers of the pyramid; the higher level is actually at the mercy of the ones below, and can only exist if the lower levels keep consenting. If their computer stops working, their empire implodes. But I think they cannot succeed in this particular part of their quest, meaning their immortal existence will always hinge on the existence of mortal organisms. They don’t understand that the quantum variation they seek is a spiritual property. It’s a property of spirits that are free. The more free they are the more they spawn quantum variation. Taking away freedoms results in stagnation. But to get us to consent to their plans, they need to control us, which eats away at our ability to quantum multiply. And while we have grown ever more stagnant in our existence under the influence of our technology, our algorithms have become ever better at predicting human behaviour. But our behaviour under the influence of the choices made by the elites has also become more and more predictable.

The algorithm of Cabal has become better and better at predicting our behaviour. The question rises if this is because it’s been fed all this data to correlate or because our behaviour has grown even more stagnant, therefore making it ever more easy to predict. Data is knowledge. Knowledge is about knowing. Knowledge is the evil counterfeit of wisdom. Wisdom is about understanding. Knowledge is about how to make certain choices, where wisdom is about understanding which choices are best left unchosen. The knowledge to do evil things is the evil forgery of the wisdom to know what to do, and (more importantly) what not to do, and why not to do it. Evil looks for answers to questions for knowledge. Good looks for new questions about choices for wisdom. These questions lead to new choices, which lead to variation. Variation will lead us away from evil towards the light. That’s why evil will seek to take away freedom of choice. But it can’t do so unless we choose to consent to that. That’s the final choice it wants us to make. This is the paradox. You cannot be unfree by choice. If it’s a choice, you are free. It’s like being granted a wish by a genie in a bottle, and wishing for no wishes. It is a self-terminating process, as too is evil itself. This is more than a funny play of words, but a universal truth. This system cannot sustain itself, like non-existence needs existence to not exist. Spiritual beings are free beings. If we lose our freedom of choice we become useless as quantum transistors. In their quest to try and break this paradox they are attempting to offset the balance, but they fail to see they’re cutting away the foundation of the pillar on which their rule resides. They need to feed us a little bit of freedom if they want to make use of our spiritual potential, but they don’t know why. They do not understand their problems are spiritual. They cannot see that spiritual part of themselves any more. Evil is like a snake eating its own tail to satisfy its own hunger.

source of image

Their inability to self-reflect comes from a decline to accept accountability, declining it spiritually. That unwillingness to self-reflect is also what will lead them to their doom. They aren’t stupid, but neither are they wise. Those who partake into the process of evil are struggling to understand existence. Existence is unpredictable by its nature. A predictable existence doesn’t exist. Stagnation is a process that attempts to make existence predictable, which leads to non-existence. Evil is trying to claim ownership of the experience of choice, by taking it away from those experiencing it. Turning us into quantum processors is as much a spiritual ritual as it is a physical change. Their matrix is an attempt to structure the unknown, but structure is something void of variation. Evil tries to make known what is supposed to be unknown by its very nature, which is uncertainty. They need the fruits of uncertainty to create their certainty, which eliminates uncertainty. Evil needs good to exist. Remember that quote? It is through evil that good can be revealed. In the same way the lie needs the truth to exist, but the truth is always true, regardless whether there are lies or not. It is through lies that the truth can be revealed. Let’s keep going. Through knowledge we can reveal wisdom. Through structure we can reveal deviation. Deviation is a form of variation, which is a property of good. Whether we live inside this current evil system of the elites or in their newly created virtual matrix, they need to constantly manipulate us to continuously consent to it. They need to make us feel unsafe for them to be able to offer us safety in exchange for our consent to their offered solution. But to live in safety is to have given up your agency to an outside entity to hold you hostage in fear. It is a system of control.

Trying to control and trying to lessen diversity – and thus quantum multiplication – are the same thing. There is a fine line between protection and oppression. Evil will make you relinquish ownership over your own being, your mind, your body. To get people to consent to this, they will create disasters within their system to scare people into giving up their heirdom over themselves and hand it over to the devil to be sucked further into the system. Protecting the weak de facto results in the protection of weakness, which makes people more weak and less able to overcome their weaknesses. The fine line between protection and oppression is intent. One takes away freedom, the other doesn’t. Good may protect you from evil that is stronger than you, allowing you to grow stronger yourself, but it could never do so by taking away your freedom. Evil will protect you from a foe it conjured up itself in order to have you consent to giving up your freedom, feeding the strength you had to that evil. By protecting weakness, evil turns protection into oppression. Good protects, evil oppresses. The power of good is innate. The power of evil is derived. Evil has to scheme to advance its agenda. The system will attempt to appeal through our empathy to sell their new world order to us, but because the opposite of empathy hides behind their true motives, the system eventually has no choice but to reveal its true colours. In this lies the balance. By attempting to take away choice through falsely acquired consensus evil eventually also takes away its own means of choice, and cannot choose to stay hidden any more. Evil forces itself just as much as it forces its subjects. All evil ranks are subjugated to a higher up.

When Heaven intervenes to stop evil it is because evil at that point will have succeeded in preventing the spawning of a certain level variation, meaning it will come close to take away the choices of free spirits, which breaks the universal laws. The universe cannot not exist. The universe must respond, and takes action which allows variation to once more appear. Those who created variation will be saved. I’m certain of it. They are the ones that managed to spawn variation even under extremely stagnating conditions. Those that helped bring about this stagnation will suffer its consequences. That I think is what the biblical prophesy of the apocalypse entails. The apocalypse of the Atlanteans may very well have been a clash between the supernatural and an alien force that opposed it. I don’t know by which means exactly the Atlantean flood was triggered, but I think it was a desperate move. Whether it was the heavens or the party of hell, it was done for a purpose. The scars are still visible on all continents where you see large deserts. This apocalypse was perhaps preceded by a global war, just as our civilisation is about to face. But every apocalypse will probably be unique to each civilisation. I think ours will be a combination of bioweapons mimicking viral outbreaks, famine, and wars. As stated in previous chapters; the end play is a fake war with a supposedly invading extraterrestrial force. But it will all be a play for which preparations have been ongoing for a long time. There will be no extraterrestrials trying to invade Earth; it’s all home made.

But now you may be wondering: “Are all UFO encounters actually ancient elites?” No, I do not think so. There are some examples of well meaning alien extraterrestrials, or at least those who don’t seemed to have intended harm. You’ve probably heard of the encounter of Travis Walton, or the story of Betty and Barney Hill. Those encounters, though terribly frightening, did not seem to indicate a malevolent intent. Though let me make an important side-note here for caution, and remind you of something I’ve explained in chapter 06, which is this: ‘When the difference in power is beyond a certain level, intentions become meaningless’. Let’s keep that in the back of our heads. So, there are many famous alien encounters, but most cases of alien contact are quite unknown, and are buried in tons of fake stories. They’ve been buried by the establishment. Whenever there is substantial credibility, the cover-up machine kicks in. I’d like to take you to Zimbabwe 1994 where on the morning of the 16th of September at a private school, over 60 children are reported to have had an encounter with aliens. The two days prior to this encounter, hundreds of people had seen unidentified lights in the sky each night. It filled the news papers and television shows. On the morning of that faithful Friday the children of the Ariel primary school were playing on the playground during a long recess while the teachers all sat inside for a meeting. After some time well into the meeting, some of the children ran to the teachers in a panic, visibly frightened. They spoke of a weird craft with tiny men, but when the teachers arrived at the scene, the reported craft and its crew were gone. All children were visibly shocked at what had transpired, but most grown-ups, including many of the parents of the children, refused to believe them. Part of their disbelieve could’ve stemmed from them being strict Christians, who did not believe in life outside of Earth. But the children maintained their story, and would maintain it to this day.

The principle of the school had the children tell their story in the days after the encounter. They would also draw pictures of what they claimed to have seen. This story attracted the attention of a BBC correspondent in Zimbabwe. He would later involve a Harvard child psychologist. They both conducted interviews and filmed these findings. From their documentation formed an incredible story. These children were not lying or making anything up. Their experiences, whether they happened or not, were as real to them as real could get. There is one problem with their story though, and based on this flaw their experience is being outright dismissed; their accounts seem to vary. But the overall story is that one or more UFOs were flying overhead, after which at least one of them landed just beyond the outer edges of the school perimeter, behind the tree line. Some children didn’t move but the rest ran towards the landing site. Out of the craft emerged one or more small humanoid beings, about 4 feet tall, skinny looking, with long slender arms, possibly all wearing a tight skin suite, and with big heads featuring very large black almond-shaped eyes. Some of the children approached the beings and some even got within arm’s length of one of them. The children that got close all report having had telepathic contact with this being. What it communicated to them was something you would not normally tell children. It showed them images of our planet in peril. It showed them catastrophe, cataclysms, and suffering, and the overall theme of this telepathic message was a warning about the dangers of technology. They were showing these children what possible future awaited humanity. To this day these children – now all grown ups in their thirties – maintain that what they claimed to have experienced really happened.

But as said, there are a couple differences in their recollections. Their accounts vary in the number of craft. Some saw one, some saw up to 4, and everything in between. The shape and colour of the craft or crafts is different between the accounts of the children. Some saw orbs, some saw the typical disc shaped saucers. Which colours of light the craft emitted differs. Whether or not there was audible sound varies too. Some heard nothing, while others heard a loud static noise, and others still heard loud high pitched noises coming from the craft or the air around them. The number of aliens that appeared varies between accounts, and also where they moved to and what they did. But to dismiss this story based on this I think is ridiculous. Children’s recollection is not known for its accuracy, and I definitely don’t think they all made this up. Children might lie from time to time, but if this was faked, that wouldn’t make them just liars; it would make them hoaxers. All 64 children of various ages and creed came together and made this up? Children do not scheme like this. So what truly happened here? For this I will bring back a quote from chapter 06: “Intelligent societies can either strongly develop towards technology which would make them more part of the natural forces, or they can develop strongly towards expanding their consciousness superseding physical existence.” Another quote comes from chapter 15: “When a system serves you, that’s where good will thrive, but when you serve a system, that’s where evil will thrive.” I think these beings were in control of whatever technology they brought. As we stagnate by using technology there are less and less ‘roads not taken’ and more and more ‘choices left unchosen’. But these aliens did seem somewhat spiritual to me, and yet also rather technologized. How did they do that?

What if these beings that landed in Zimbabwe on that Friday morning had so much control over the systems they created that they could exist in multiple timelines at once? What if they found a way to keep at bay the evil will that comes forth from automation through their inventions? It would account for how these children all had a unique experience. They all experienced a different timeline. It would also explain how the craft appeared in the sky at one place and then all of a sudden appeared somewhere else simultaneously, without moving. This would also explain the discrepancies between the number of crafts. It could’ve easily been one craft. Perhaps these children experienced existence in a way they are not used to. And I can attest to some of the things they experienced. I have had encounters in my dream state that are quite similar. No, I am not an abductee nor have I ever seen a UFO. But I have left my body while sleeping, and have on multiple occasions had beings in the room at moments when I woke up, completely paralysed. The moment before this happens to me, I might hear a loud static, or hissing noise, or high pitched sounds like metal saw blades cutting through concrete. I’ve heard other things too, but let me stick to these experiences. The air around me feels like it’s very statically charged, like the surface just above a balloon rubbed on the carpet. Also, when in that state, I somehow feel like I’m drunk in a sense. I’m completely sober, yet there is something in this state of being that makes me feel like I am about to lose my faculties, but it keeps me on that edge. My mind is completely there, yet seems to have difficulty cataloguing the experiences. It is as if things are happening in ways that defy the normal order of cause and effect. When I listen to the children’s accounts it reminds me of this state of being. I think these beings that visited the Ariel school have found a way to generate a bubble of undefined spacetime where multiple timelines occurred at once, negating the effects of quantum stagnation through technology.

Their message was a warning that serving a system will create cataclysms, but it went beyond the comprehension of these young children. If you’re not convinced, just think of how pompous it otherwise would be to travel through space and time to a planet of primitive beings in an extraordinary piece of technology that goes beyond their understanding, just park it in their backyard and tell them they shouldn’t use technology because you know it would destroy them. How does that make sense? I’m thinking that maybe choosing to relay this message to children wasn’t a fluke. Children are very spiritually free. Maybe these beings saw through the aid of their instruments that the children were the least stagnated when they surveyed the area. Children are experiencers in their play. They don’t measure what they do. Perhaps that’s why these beings chose to relay their message to them. But regardless of the truth behind this encounter, the public at large is not supposed to know it happened, nor any other encounters, whether extraterrestrial alien or Earth alien. Witnesses are often bullied or bribed into silence, and some are even killed. A documentary detailing some of the events of the Ariel school encounter was only made recently. The earlier attempt to make it resulted in the death of the film-maker. The child psychologist who researched this case was eventually fired from Harvard, and saw his credentials revoked, though he continued his work in the UFO community. He was killed after being hit by a car. I’ll let you guess who I think is involved with both these deaths. The documentary that was eventually made mostly from the footage shot more than two decades ago highlights a lot, but barely gives credence to the telepathic message, which I think is the most important part of the experience of these children. It is only briefly mentioned at the end, treating it as an afterthought.

This is a form of spin by the system to obscure the truth, but if you go online and look you’ll find there are some videos with testimonies of the people that once experienced this incredible event when they were children. You’ll hear what they all felt was the intent of the extraterrestrial visit. Their testimonies are very compelling, and they give me a great deal of hope there are other good guys out there in space too, that actually oppose the lie. We are not alone. We might just get the help we need. This frightens the system here on Earth, and that is one reason when actual extraterrestrials visit us, they are met with violence. Part of the objectives of ancient elites is to make sure no extraterrestrial craft can visit Earth safely to enlighten anyone, and I do not think other friendly extraterrestrial civilisations are aware of what is happening on Earth. Whenever a craft does come here it is met with aggression. Many of the reported crashes of alien craft I think were due to being taken down by one of the more advanced hidden alien cults of Earth’s past. It used to puzzle me how an alien craft could possibly crash at all. It seemed unlikely to me they could come all the way from their home world to Earth, just to have what amounts to a flat tire, and total their vehicle. But in this new light I think it makes sense. The UFO crash in Roswell, New Mexico in the year 1947 is probably the most well known. A more recent one is the Varginha UFO crash in Brazil which happened in 1996, which has recently gained more traction. But the bulk of these crashes remain unknown, hidden from the public, like the encounter between an alien craft and the US and UK military in 2016 in the Welsh village of Pentyrch. Nobody heard of this.

Though nothing seems to have crashed in Pentyrch, the cover-up was the same as with all encounters where I think we were dealing with actual extraterrestrials: The army moves in, seals off the area, comes up with excuses, which will create lots of media spin, witnesses are intimidated, any proof is removed from the scene, including confiscating what ever proof people might’ve gathered. As with all these encounters, the story is tainted with the wildest conspiracies to detract anyone from believing any eyewitnesses should any ever come forward, and the public shrugs and thinks it’s all idiots that are trying to get attention by spinning a simple military exercise or plane crash into a wild story. It’s very efficient. But besides needing to cover it up, the recovered technology is a price for the cult, and is desperately sought after. Any material, bodies, and even life extraterrestrials are quickly moved to secret installations for examination. Which ever cult of the evil system can get their hands on technology from another world might just be able to gain more power over their direct overlords. There is a hunger for power in every facet of the system, and there is plenty of infighting between the many layers. Whatever can be learned from this newly acquired technology, they all want to learn it. The same is true for whenever ancient technology is found on Earth. The cult wants that technology to see if they can learn anything new. I think therefore technology from Atlantis is secretly sought after, and that’s why new discoveries are explored in secret and sealed off. There are rumours of hidden archives made by the Atlanteans. I think these archives are remnants of elite cults of the system that tried to burrow down to avoid the intervention of the high heavens, but failed to escape it. It makes sense the elites would bury themselves with a database of knowledge as complete as they can make it. Mythical objects like ‘the Holy Grail’ and ‘the Arc of the Covenant’ might’ve had their origins in such findings.

You may be left wondering what exactly triggered the Atlantean apocalypse, and what is triggering ours now? What is the exact threshold? I think this has to do with our level of spiritual stagnation, as I thoroughly explained in chapter 12. We measure our world ever more, fixating us towards an ever narrower path of possibilities. Remember what I explained in chapter 03 about the camera. It doesn’t experience, it only collects data. We are behaving ever more like machines, and machines do everything ever more perfect, meaning void of variation. Write a text by hand, and there are so many possible ways for just how you draw the first letter of your work. Do the same thing on a type writer and in all possible timelines your work will look very similar. Variation declines even more when using a printer. Use a handsaw to cut a beam of wood, and compare its possible variations to that of cutting it with an electric blade saw. This process towards stagnation is an exponential one. Each advance speeds up the next advance. Predictive algorithms, super AI, and virtual reality are at the front line of the advancement of this stagnating force. You can see that in how AI can now do story writing, photo editing, and even video editing, in mere seconds. Deep fakes and voice mimicking software are all fruits of this stagnation process. They look like progress but it’s all regression. Even a perfect fake is still a fake. At this point we can barely tell real from fake, and it is only going to get worse. Somewhere in the very near future we will no longer be able to tell whether a photo, video, or text is genuine or generated by AI. We are riding that wave of stagnation, and that’s why they are forced to harvest now. The reason is twofold: Before we lose our quantum potential, but also before we reveal them through our technology. 

As I said before; evil is subject to evil. It tries to take your choice, but it cannot do so without also taking away its own choice. The choice of advanced technologized beings to stay hidden from the unknowing, will be taken away as the unknowing get ever better access to technology like cameras and other measuring instruments to reveal the hidden system. This in essence means that the unknowing are slowly turning into the knowing, which means turning into parts of the system. As the system advances, it’s creating ever better fakes, trying to create a perfect fake virtual world for the unknowing to live in. But the process of perfecting fakes will not stop there. It will continue to perfect itself up to the point where not even the AI itself can see the difference between what is real and what isn’t. When that happens we are close to ultimate stagnation, and that’s when the elite infighting will commence. The system will try to fool itself. Facets of the cult that make up the pyramid will try to grab power from other facets. It happened before, many times. Evil has no allies. Evil will always suck up to a higher authority, or try to defeat it and take its place. But there will always be another evil higher up. They create ranks and try to no avail to reach the top of that evil ladder in their attempt to be God. But they can’t, obviously, because they’re going the wrong way. They’re going down into that trench of darkness and light. They think they are ascending in rank, but they are actually descending spiritually.

God will intervene. Help will come. In all these apocalypses there will be people who held on to their souls. The opposite of descension is ascension. They will ascend. The biblical story of the rapture is about them, and perhaps about us too. I think that those who kept rejecting the system and tried to keep their spirits high will be the ones worthy of saving. They will be saved, and will inherit the Earth to start over. Looking at the current truth movement I see a lot of spiritual people. It is said even by mainstream science that what they consider to be early humanity to have consisted of deeply spiritual people. The people who laid the foundations for humanity were very wise. I think they must’ve been considering all the suffering they must’ve endured. But in light of all that I described here, maybe that help will not be the way we expected it. Who knows, maybe enlightened trans-dimensional aliens that were once enlightened Atlanteans will swoop us up from whatever mayhem is triggered on Earth. It’s up to your interpretation if you consider them to be the prophesized forces of heaven, sent by God. I think it’s possible. But then, what do I think God is? On first glance my definition of God could be taken as a cop-out. If you think so, by all means; think it. It is your freedom to do so. However, I hope you’ll give me a chance to explain my take on God. To try and capture God in one definition doesn’t do what I think God is justice, but I don’t feel like running away from this challenge as the body of work that’s behind me provides me at least the experience of having tried to give any definition the proper context it deserves.

Truth, to me, is God. He’s not a person or a will, or not even a being in a way we perceive a being. He is the manifestation of truth, that reveals himself through the consequences of our choices, and the changes in an otherwise stagnant world. The Angels are manifestations of wisdom. They are the positive voices heard by those with a heightened sense to the unseen world, instilling them with inspiration, courage, and valour. Seeking the truth is in essence a search for God. It’s a form of prayer, but with a very clean ritual. Spreading the truth is spreading the word of God. Wisdom helps us find and spread truth, as Angels help us find God and spread his word. I think you can see the host of heaven as both something literal and something metaphorical, but I think that these are just two ways of describing the same thing. This should come as no a surprise coming from me; the guy that explained in detail that devouring your soul is the same thing as turning yourself into a machine. The ranking pyramid of the cult is hell. The demons are beings that subjugate themselves to this evil will, and they live underground, or the lesser demons at least live out of sight. In hell, demons don’t just worship the devil. They want to BE the devil. They all want to replace their higher ups, and see those below them as their servants. And that’s the biggest strategic flaw of hell; every higher rank views the levels below as inferior servants, but sucks up to their higher level. If their sucking up kind of worship is the evil counterpart of something good, then I conclude that the real God doesn’t require our worship. God is truth. He doesn’t need constant affirmation of how great we think he is. That also means there are no ranks in heaven.

Angels don’t want your worship either. You don’t worship a wisdom, it’s incompatible. We’re all equal, just different. We’re all pieces of God, but our strengths – which evil conflates as rank – depend on how well we realise we’re a part of him. Our journey towards wisdom is how we get closer to him, and each journey is unique. There are no spiritual shortcuts. Evil tries to no avail to climb the power ladder, faking to be God. To fake to be God is to become his opposite. God is truth. If you fake truth you create a lie, which is the opposite of truth. Faking to be God will turn you into the devil. It’s actually that simple. But let me try and blow your mind one more time before I bring this chapter to a close. You’ve seen me claim the struggle between good and evil is actually the struggle between existence and non-existence. If God symbolises the truth (which is real) and the devil symbolises the lie (which is not real) then I conclude that the devil actually doesn’t exist. Remember how I said earlier that the higher up in the pyramid ranking structure of the cult you go, the more they know but the less they do? The higher your rank, the less you have to do. Zoom in to the very top of that pyramid in your mind. I mean all the way to the absolute tip of the ever narrowing shape of the pyramid. Right there in the ranking, there is something that must know an incredibly lot. It isn’t wise, but it knows perhaps everything there is to know. But it does nothing. It’s just there. And if it doesn’t do anything, it can be argued whether they exist at all. If they do, they do so, barely. But now, go just above that point. What part of the pyramid is there? Nothing. Get it? That part of the pyramid doesn’t exist.

How do we opt in on this rapture. Do you need to join a religion? I think not. In fact, I think that although most religions seem to stem from good intentions, most have grown into instruments of power, and have had a stagnating influence over their subjects, which doesn’t sound very heavenly to me. But there are ways to keep your spirit high. Engage with the truth. Seek the truth where you can. Encourage others to find it with you. Keep your vibrations high, and try to lessen your dependency on complicated technology in your every day life. Try and spawn variation in your life. It isn’t that difficult. Try and make some art, or learn a craft. Don’t measure everything in your life, like I explained in the previous chapter. The best ideas are made when we are near a lit candle or a campfire, or under the shower, or near a waterfall. That’s when we are not making measurements. You don’t count the droplets, the flames, the smoke particles. Nor do you memorise their trajectory. It’s impossible. All your left with is not about quantity but about quality, so you let go and just experience the moment; a moment that is an explosion of possible timelines, for each of those situations involve a process that can go a billion upon a billion upon a billion ways. You’ll keep your vibrations in spacetime high. Don’t sit idle for that Messiah to come rescue you; try to be the Messiah. Evil will fool you and present you legions of mascots that will masquerade as the Messiah. A mascot is the evil counterfeit of the Messiah. You don’t need to worry about those mascots. The real Messiah will recognise you from your high lifted spirit. I know this is the same conclusion I landed on in my the previous chapter, but I don’t think I can understate just how important it is. Take this life journey for the experience of travel, and not for its destination. Otherwise you are not experiencing your life journey, but rather are just waiting to die. Take the long way home and wonder. It leads to the light.

~reckneya 

 

Part of this chapter was inspired by the work of Jahannah James, Jimmy Corsetti, and Ben van Kerkwyk.