Published: 10-12-2021
Updated: 16-03-2024
This chapter should be seen as a continuation of the previous chapter. We’ve explored why and where our economy, government and educational systems should change, but I was clear these are just the first of many other areas that are going to need change. Companies should be capped in growth. I talked about ways for abolishment of power and replacing it with responsibility, and education that restores human curiosity. But the changes there are only the beginning. In this chapter I will highlight other areas. There are absolutely many more besides these. Hopefully you’ll be able to find some of those hidden away in these texts if you run into obstacles.
Justice:
The society in which I grew up is unable to truly render justice. Our justice systems are often too harsh or too lenient. Whether or not you are found guilty and what the severity of your punishment is can depend on your sex, the colour of your skin, what your social status is, and how much money you have; all factors that should have no baring on true justice at all whatsoever. Our justice systems suffer from biases. These are partially caused by our instincts which can flaw our judgement, but there is more going on here. Many if not most of the rules we enforce through our court and justice systems are rules for people who cannot afford to break them. For the rich, fines and financial penalties are just surcharges to break the law. The law isn’t meant to protect the people. On the surface it make look like it does, and it partially may do that, but it is mostly there to protect invested interest and the power of those that invested that money and/or the people that have that power. For the richest the citizens of the world are their assets. We are their investments. Every time there is a war and people die, it’s about rich people clashing and threatening to terminate the assets of the other group.
Our justice systems need a complete overhaul. We need to honestly ask ourselves what justice really is. What happens in our courts today? Are judges and lawyers really there to bring justice? As a kid I used to see lawyers as people who just memorised incredibly complicated rules and regulations, but now I know it’s not just that. They know their way around the law to allow them to lie, and use the system in such a way the lie isn’t considered a lie but a formality. Why are all these rules and laws so complicated? The law should be simple in my opinion. Couldn’t it just say:
Rule 1; Don’t kill anyone.
Rule 2: Don’t exploit others.
There. We’re done. This is all we need. One page. But of course things may not be so simple. Now we have to define what exploitation is. I can see how it eventually could grow out into something a little bit more complicated. But my point stands; there is absolutely no reason for the law to be something so incredibly complicated you need to study years and years to master it. We should be able to explain the law to a child.
But instead of drafting a law book filled with things we are not allowed to do, I think we should actually fill it mostly with our rights. What rights do we have? The book should protect the individual by stating mostly what their rights are, not what people must or cannot do. The things we cannot do – next to exploitation – is to kill other people. We should really stay far away from that. It is not up to us to end a human life for judgemental reasons. To grant a wish of ending suffering is of course different. If ever we come in a position to end a life it should be an act of mercy if we decide to do it at all. Never should anger or fear be our motivation to kill. These emotions will result in machinelike motivations, as you hopefully now understand. Either all life is sacred, or none of it is. I think it is, and we should never ever take a life passively. But you can’t take a stroll through a forest and not crush a few innocent ferns along your way, meaning we can’t prevent every kill, but we shouldn’t take it lightly ever, and we should always mind our step. Only machines terminate life, without experiencing the consequences. So apart from these and perhaps a few other rules our new rule book should state mostly our individual rights. But I imagine this won’t go flawlessly. Not all individuals will be ready for this, and laws may be needed. In the beginning, especially. In the future, hopefully only as relics to explain our past.
We have to understand rights are God-given, and obligations embody the will of the devil. The products of rights are the will of the light. The products of obligations are the will of the darkness. Evil will attempt to make their obligations look like rights by changing their package. They may state you have the right to be free from work once a week, but that’s actually the obligation to be forced to work 6 days a week in disguise. Obligations are the devil’s counterfeit rights, but they actually take rights away from you. Your rights are universal, and you only need those. There is no need to have rules because of this, as you don’t have the right to ignore the rights of others. In a perfect world this would be followed by everyone and it would be a world without sin. But our world is not a perfect world. Not everyone will understand the good vs. bad dynamic, and some will fall under the spell of evil. When these people break the one rule to not do onto others what they would not want done onto themselves, how do we proceed? Remember then that love kills the demon. Have compassion. Try and understand their reason to want to experience the fall. Pull them back up. In a world of love and understanding the demons cannot thrive. Only in severe circumstances would rights of self-defence apply. Defend yourself with compassion for your enemy. You only have to fight for your rights against evil. There truly is nothing more. All other conflicts are most likely a charade to have you fight a battle that isn’t yours, against a foe that isn’t really your enemy and who was tricked the same way you were.
A good judge doesn’t climb to power but is elected in the moment. A good judge will not pass judgement but will create the circumstances for those who’s conscience bears the weight of misconduct to come to terms with it. They will motivate a wrongdoer to see their mischiefs and request judgement. They will make sure their rule is aimed at reconciliation and recovery, not retribution and punishment. Whenever we need a judge we should recognise the spiritual implications of that specific situation. It means that at that moment society is wounded and needs to heal. A good judge sees the bigger picture and doesn’t concern themselves with petty details. Though they will do their best to shine a light on all relevant details and will hear all that are affected, they will highlight the things that matter most in light of the bigger picture. What matters is intent; prior intent and the intent going forward. Imprisonment may be needed. Perhaps by request of the guilty or as a means to adjure the ruling. Life in imprisonment should not be torture but humane, and should neither be without prospects for a better life. We should never take away the ability for any human being to grow spiritually. Our justice systems should be based on compassion and the protection of that empathy.
Healthcare:
Our healthcare systems have been morally corrupted by money. Profit driven healthcare isn’t about caring for health. In the pharmaceutical industry, the money is in selling the drug, not curing the decease. Because of this our healthcare systems have transformed a group of caring and loving people that wished to cure and care for other human beings in need of medical help into puppets of a machine that turned patients into clients that can perpetually be milked for more income by finding the right balance between administering medicine and alleviating symptoms. Effective medication is medication that is less economically viable than medication that cures less well or even only battles symptoms and not the cause. These factors have changed Western medicine into something it was never supposed to be. We all need healthcare. This means all of us have been feeding our money into this beast of a soulless system, and it has grown big. It has grown so big in fact that it has played a major role in this elite induced reset. Unelected medical “experts” have taken key positions in the decision making process that now attempts to dictate our fate.
Besides damaging their own reputation with their blatant lies the damage they have done when it comes to trusting medical expertise as a whole is unimaginably big. It may take generations before most people will ever trust doctors again. If this crisis has showed me anything it is that even the smartest can forsake their sworn oath and become puppets for an evil machine. Most doctors were smart enough to get their grades and positions but couldn’t see the monster they were helping create because of their blind trust in the authority of the medical experts who were on the payroll of the globalists. Humanity proved to be quite programmable, and the doctors and other medical experts that volunteered to substantiate the narrative by cherry-picking anecdotes and ignoring counter-narrative research and experiences have played a key role. They had the power to stop this massacre dead in its tracks if most held true to the oath of Hippocrates. An oath they all took. Any new healthcare system we build must be made to prevent this from ever happening again. Doctors and other medical experts should never be allowed to team up against humanity this way ever again. We need to find out where this went wrong.
Our healthcare system should rely on positive outcome. Medical care should be free. No more profit driven health care. Profit driven health care is about profit first and at best about health second. There’s enough money to be made in health care without the focus on financial gain. If a more comfortable life needs to be the drive behind our healthcare system then let those that spawn the best results health-wise be the ones that can enjoy that. But much rather I think we should make use of that innate human quality of compassion, and build our healthcare systems from there. Most medical personnel started their journey as healthcare workers because they wanted to do something good. Let that be the motivation. Curing should become the highest priority again. When it comes to medicine we should much more carefully weigh what we consider medicine and what we don’t consider it to be. In the last decades the medical world has changed its perception on what medication should do and what it shouldn’t. Good medication results in less patients. If we can take the corrupt elements out of our medicine manufacturing we start curing the world physically and spiritually.
Food / nutrition:
Many of our bodily ailments of the current age are caused by our lifestyles, specifically by the food many eat. Processed foods have become the standard in most households, with terrible consequences. The processing plants where food is processed take in such quantities of food it cannot be grown locally. The food often comes from third world countries. Because the factories process so much they can demand low prices so farmers can’t ever build up much capital for themselves. The processed products themselves are sent all around the world too, and therefore need a long shelf-life. The expiry dates of these foods is being extended by adding many chemical preservatives and by various ways of packaging. The preservatives cause undeniable damage to our health. The food industry has put so much of this under wraps by controlling the research about the effects of their additives. Research is expensive and so they financed most of it to secure their interests in the published outcomes. I suspect many of these additives are at least partially to blame for the decline in health we’ve seen over the last couple of decades. Allergies, learning disabilities, cancer, reduced fertility; they’ve all risen together with the coming of modern technology. This includes our modern food production, but also modern medicine. To compel the customer to choose a certain product above others the products are also filled with additives to make them addictive, no pun intended. Fat, sugar, and salt all act as flavour enhancers that make the food taste better, but also reek havoc on our physical health. And these are by far not the worst additives. Not at all.
To compete with other farmers and to keep up with growing demand the production had to be ramped up every year and we’ve devised many ways to increase our output. We’ve used manure and synthetic fertiliser, complemented with growth accelerators to get plants to grow and bear fruit more quickly. But even that wasn’t good enough. We have started manipulating plants genetically to increase their production even more, and we’ve become quite skilled at it. We used to do this through manual selection but now we have the technology to implement all kinds of new genes in plants or take out genes we find undesirable. This may all have its merits, but when nutrition is also taken into account it clearly doesn’t. It was all about the quantity of food, not the quality of it. Because of this the vegetables and fruits we eat are ever less nutritious than they were decades ago. The existence of the growing industry of vitamin and mineral supplements as a sister endeavour of the pharmaceutical industry attests to this. Food is all about taste these days, and nutrition has become an afterthought. It’s important to understand that the selective pressure of profit has shaped it that way by design. There’s more money to be made from malnourished people. Healthy people cost the elites money, because they purchase less medicines and they’ll live longer into their retirement, enjoying their pensions from the pension fund.
Our food industry has to change. Nutrition should be the prime goal. Also do we need to make sure the foods that can be grown locally, to be grown there and not come from overseas. The middleman has to be cut out as much as we can, because this is where the elites have hidden much of their covert money collecting schemes, by skilfully organising the supply chain over long distances and setting up rules and regulations that artificially increase the costs of the foods, meaning those that grow it get almost nothing while the elites gain wealth through selling overseas. This is how the farmers in the poor countries only get a few cents where at the destination the product will cost a hundredfold more on the shelves in the richer countries. By growing food locally as much as possible we can make food cheaper so nobody has to suffer from famine, but we would also give the farmers a fairer share of the end price. Of course not all sorts of foods grow well everywhere and trade will logically be needed for these products. This can be a trade that is beneficial to all involved, and specifically not for rich globalists.
Food should meet nutritional standards. There should not be any patents possible on any genetic changes made in plants, whether done by selection or in a lab. All properties of seeds should be free to use by anyone who wants to. Nobody should be able to own a genetic property of another life-form. It’s absolutely ridiculous, and dangerous, too. We should encourage people to grow food themselves as well. It should be a pass time for many if only to understand the hard work needed for a crate of fruits or vegetables. With nutrition in focus individuals will become more healthy and less prone to disease. Vitamin and mineral supplements shall become a thing of the past, at least for casual use. Processed foods should also disappear as well as much as possible. We should realise that all those beverages in the stores are all just chemically flavoured sugar water with preservatives in them. We’ve become addicted to them. Surely I don’t want to forbid anyone from wanting to indulge into an addiction, but we’ve normalised the addiction right now and I think we can do without them. There is nothing wrong with adding a little sweet and flavour to your drink, but there are far more natural ways to do that. Our taste buds right now are overstimulated. Once that wears off we will be able to discover amazing tastes again. Subtle tastes that escape our experience right now.
Instead of buying factory produced foods we should try and make the things we want from their basic ingredients as much as we can locally. Most people nowadays have no idea how to cook. For a long time, neither did I! But it is quite simple and fun. Though, to be fair, I understand that’s not something everyone shares with me. Nobody should be forced to cook, and nobody has to. If cooking is not for you there is probably someone who wants to do that for you, near you, cause I know that anyone who likes to cook loves to cook for others. I’m just saying that a factory doesn’t have to do your cooking. In a healthy economy you should have no trouble getting a nutritious meal made with love and care for a fair price. Changing the supply chain this way will also change the way we package our foods, and this is a big thing. Right now, I see no reason why I can’t bring my own little bin to the grocery store and scoop it full with creamed garlic cheese, but I can’t. I have to buy it in a plastic bin which I throw away after I’m done with it, just to start over and buy a new bin. The same goes for drinking bottles, though in the Netherlands we do have a deposit system where one pays extra for each bottle which can be refunded after returning the empty bottle. We should package much more of our drinks and other foods in glass bottles. Why does every bottle need to have a distinct shape? If we can distribute most our drinks in glass bottles of the same shape, and implement a deposit system on those bottles, we’ll be shedding so much less garbage than we are now. This would be a form of actual sustainability.
Energy:
We are in need of sustainable resources. This ties in with our garbage disposal. As an individual, littering is forbidden and punishable, but a multi million dollar corporation can litter with impunity. Big garbage corporations collect our garbage and put most of it in landfills for a price. The litter they handle is effectively litter from the things individuals purchased. Basically the individual is paying others to dump their litter. Recycling would be one venue where we need to change. The oil industry has proven itself to be way too powerful for any real change on this front-line. Right now people think they are helping the world become more sustainable by separating their plastics in a plastic waste bin and switching from fossil fuel based heating to electric heating. They don’t realise they are paying twice for the same product. It’s such a clever scheme. We buy most of our products in plastic. This plastic we then discard, which is then collected (sometimes even against payment), then transported to a power plant, where it’s burned and its chemical energy transformed into electricity, which we then buy again from the energy company, owned by the same people who own the oil companies. We’re actually buying the same oil twice or even trice if we pay for collection, and it does absolutely nothing to better our environmental impact. In fact, I’ve seen an increase of garbage along roads and in nature. We’ve grown used to seeing plastic as a waste product and it has impacted the way we deal with it without any care for what it does to our surroundings. We need to do away with all this plastic production, and the way we see plastic as a disposable product. Plastic is everywhere, creating much unneeded waste.
But that still leaves us with a need for energy, regardless if that energy is electric or other. Whether you believe in climate change or not, there is something to be said for producing cleaner energy. God knows the oil industry has hindered all development of truly sustainable resources, and I think we are decades behind to what we could have discovered by now. Wind energy has its limits. Wind turbines make a lot of noise, they’re an ugly sight on the horizon, and most importantly they cause many fatalities among birds. The surroundings of all wind turbines are graveyards filled with dead birds that got hit by the blades, because birds cannot interpret what they see in the right context when they approach them from the side. These things are not nature friendly. And besides that, they cause more carbon dioxide generation in their production and maintenance than would generating the energy they generate throughout their lifespan from burning fossil fuels. Their production and manufacturing process is all but nature friendly. Solar energy has its merits, but I think we need to keep research going to make it more durable, and increase its efficiency, and to make the solar panels recyclable. Right now, I doubt whether they contribute to a net energy generation, as I explained in chapter 13. We need a major breakthrough in our energy generation and storage. We can’t be burning fossil fuels forever, and nuclear energy has its limits as well, though it is one of the best sources of energy at the moment. I really hope we can find a way to generate clean and free energy soon, so that we can finally move away from the current day shared mental illness regarding this topic.
Living spaces:
Our cities house too many people on too small an area of land. This creates a host of environmental problems, as well as removing its inhabitants from nature which comes with a host of mental and physical health problems, not to mention spiritual problems as seen from the perspective of this work. High-rise structures stack people on top of each other to their own detriment. There is very little freedom in a city. Most people have been brainwashed to see their net income as a value that indicates their wealth and freedom, but that freedom only pertains inside the system from which the city is built. People in rural areas away from the grid find themselves much less the subject of permits and laws for the things they do on a daily basis, and most of all they have access to a lot of space. In rural communities people are friendly and help each other. There is very little crime from within the community. Littering isn’t a thing mostly. People are happy. Their wants are well balanced with their needs. They take care of their own needs and live much more sustainable than any city population can. Most often these people sustain themselves and rely little on the system to provide for them. This means that big corporations and government have less of a hold on them.
Like I said in chapter 04; few city jobs are legit, and most are just part of the inflation machine that enslaves people. High-rise structures play a pivotal role in this process. I think that therefore the construction of high-rise structures should be limited, perhaps – at least to some extent – even forbidden. People who live in towering buildings crave for peace and quiet, and space to move about. It is not natural to live with so many humans on such small pieces of land. And it’s not like there is not enough space on planet Earth. That’s the lie that many people believe. But if your fridge is full of food, and that food wasn’t grown by you but someone else, doesn’t that mean that the space is available, but you just aren’t the one using it? In fact, the one producing your food is selling it into the same system where you buy it from, and the owners of that system convinced you all there just isn’t enough room for everyone. Everyone should be able to own a plot of land. This would create infrastructures that tend to the local communities, while having much less of an impact on nature than global industries do. In fact, nature thrives in rural communities. But it does mean that many people might not be able to live the exact same life they live now.
Planned obsolescence:
This is one of the bigger problems of our modern economy; planned obsolescence is rampant and everywhere. It’s created on purpose in our physical equipment and created by software tricks. The reason it is cheaper to buy a new electronic device and throw away the old broken one is not specifically because repair labour is expensive, but because the labour to collect the raw materials and construction/assembly of most of our devices is way too cheap. Think about how strange it is that if you have a completely assembled TV with one broken component, it is more expensive to just have someone fix the broken part than to have someone build an entire new TV from scratch for you. It’s completely bonkers, but we rationalise it. Machines do most of the assembly for us, and machines don’t have to be paid. Yet, the net result is a landfill with a broken TV and resources pulled out of the Earth to make the new TV. It’s not normal, yet part of our every day life. Our economy leans on this form of obsolescence, but there are more nefarious forms. The next one involves software tricks; nefarious updates that only serve to make your devices obsolete by slowing them down intentionally with lagware. Or what about updates that cannot be applied because your device doesn’t meet the minimum specification, resulting in a device that can no longer run the apps it once could. Many of our updates serve only to burden us with the need to buy a newer device that will be subject to the same scheme.
Planned obsolescence is everywhere. One of the oldest schemes is that of the light-bulb. This con is known about right in the open, yet, nobody went to prison for it. The oldest incandescent light bulbs would last years easily. The Largest companies that produced them saw their lifespan as a handicap to their sales and together came up with a design that would result in a drastically reduced lifespan for each bulb. This allowed the factories to keep supplying a growing need for light-bulbs without the market ever saturating, cause there was always a bulb somewhere that needed to be replaced. What could’ve been an interesting cautionary tale actually became standard practise. Old washing machines had no trouble operating for 20 to 30 years total, where their current age counterparts are lucky to last half that time. These devices need to break for the manufacturers to increase their profits. They can’t break too quickly as that would suggest a bad product, but they can’t last too long either. They last just long enough for us to be satisfied and short enough for the manufacturers to keep their bank accounts increasingly filled. In the future we need to put a stop to this business model. Any apparatus produced needs to meet durability standards. No more consumer products that break after two years where their 30 year old counterparts could last decades. No more planned obsolescence. It’s a business model that needs to be fined so heavily that it can never result in a sustainable operation. It would be a great incentive to start increasing our sustainability as a species. We should stop wasting so much with things we throw away just to buy a new one the next day. Sustainable packaging should also be something we heavily invest in.
Honest advertising:
I am opposed to advertisement. I truly despise it. Mostly when I encounter it, it’s deceitful and dishonest. A brand will tell you their product “fits into a healthy diet” which is as hollow a claim as any. Rocks fit into a healthy diet, too. So does faecal matter. So does a pint of beer. A diet is the totality of what you eat. There is no such thing as healthy food, just a healthy diet, with perhaps some foods that add to that for better or worse. The advertisers know this and also know how to make it seem like they’re making a claim when they aren’t. Advertisement is inherently dishonest. Whenever something has extra sugar added they’ll claim it’s because of the honey they added, which they did, just not a lot. Ever bought something that is extra fat? Neither did I, but that’s what you’re buying when they claim it’s extra creamy. Everything in advertisement is reversed. There are quality standards for products like “fair trade” that tell you the farmer got a fair portion of the price, and “FSC wood” (Dutch) that tell you the wood was acquired without destroying too much of the forest. But how weird is it that I can buy things that can’t be given that label? Shouldn’t the label be the standard? And shouldn’t the brand be obligated to tell me when they’ve been exploiting poor third world farmers to increase their own profit? Shouldn’t non-FSC wood come with a statement of how much rainforest was destroyed so that they could offer these wooden boards for this price? If it was up to me, advertisement should become a thing of the past. If we can’t do without it, let us force some real honesty into it. But really good products don’t need advertising. I’d rather just discover things myself, and there is something to be said to have each region on this planet be unique in the kinds of products they come with. The idea we need to have everything we’re used to at every venue of every street no matter which country we’re in is sickening to be honest. You can go to some fast food “restaurant” in the Netherlands, order a pizza, and it will be the exact same product you’ll get when you order it next week in Los Angeles, USA. That isn’t normal. It takes charm away from our existence. Any subtle differences help to make our world a place worth exploring. By making our lives more convenient, we’ve mostly succeeded in taking away that joy for ourselves, and we increased stagnation at the cost of variation. We’ve made our world dull.
News:
The thrill-seeking character of modern day news renders us impartial to the suffering of others. We’ve become so used to hearing of other people’s misery, it has left us empathically impotent. Only the most ludicrous headlines get the clicks, which created this selection where news had to become more and more surreal to get any traction. News is supposed to be researched and brought into order. Nowadays, news is produced and fabricated. News nowadays can easily be mistrusted. I think back to earlier days where journalists were more akin to private investigators. They’d dive into a story like a private eye to find the details hidden away by secrecy. I miss those days, though I have to ask what the purpose of investigators is in a world where there is complete transparency. If we need investigators in that world, we’ve already messed up somewhere prior. Perhaps they can function as watchers of that process, but never for the soul purpose to slate anyone publicly. I think we should be careful though what news we consume. If the run up to the pandemic has shown me anything it is that it’s a system that really lent itself for abuse. It’s been like that for a long time, and we’ve never stopped to think just how ridiculous the idea of propaganda is. But propaganda is a key word here. The promotion of an idea in the package of an executable, aimed at the feeble minded to program them with an opinion they didn’t have. Propaganda is blasphemous. Good ideas don’t need forceful promotion. Good ideas spread themselves on their own accords. When propaganda is involved, you know an evil scheme is taking place. Act accordingly.
Surveillance:
Whenever we implement a system we risk subjugating the people in that system to the control of that system, therefore the people should be in power of the system, and should be free and able to leave it should they choose to want to do that. When it comes to computer surveillance it is a system from which we can hardly escape, if at all. There is no opting out of a computer running your face through a database and making a decision based on its observations. When it’s done, it’s done. By now we should be thoroughly aware that a will without a soul is an evil will. A computer controlled surveillance system is an example of such a soulless will. We should refrain from using such systems, no matter how convenient it seems to use them. If we want a computer to analyse pictures of video of the night sky or anything else that involves science, we can be free to do so, but with a very fine understanding of how such computer controlled wills can manifest something we don’t want. When it comes to guarding the things we love, we can do that with actual people. If there is going to be made a judgement call for action, let that call be made by a person, not a computer. This is no small request but an absolute necessity. We need to be weary about letting computers make decisions for us. In a system of balance we do need to have both elements to have the balance, but it’s always a question which aspect of reality controls the other, and as long as we consciously make decisions and never turn a blind eye to the possibility of invoking a soulless will into our lives we may be able to control it. Control of an evil will is not done by dominating it but by building in consciousness and consequence. Any system needs to be kept as small as possible, and individuals as enlightened as possible simultaneously.
Oaths:
I think this may be one of the most important and easily overlooked things we need to normalise in our new world; Oaths. We should all want take oaths to serve the light in a way, especially people in positions of power. We need to make a commitment to be the best version of ourselves we can possibly be. We need to make this commitment to ourselves and the universe. I think oaths and other rituals hold real power. They allow us to turn mental knobs and flip mental switches that would otherwise be out of our reach. There’s strength in a good ritual. It’s why I think prayers can have such profound effects on those involved. When we pray, some say it is a conversation with God, others say it’s a conversation with your inner self. I think either interpretation works. If we are all a part of God, then those things are indistinguishable from each other.
Addictions:
Humankind wastes resources in addictions. Think about the tobacco industry. How many working hands and acres of land are dedicated to the production of an absolutely wasteful product. How many hours are wasted smoking this useless plant, how much is spent buying this garbage product. A product that pollutes our bodies with its toxic substances and our environment from all the wasted cigarette-buds that are thrown on the ground. Imagine we used the land where we grow tobacco plants to produce food, or left it to nature. Imagine if those working hands, cultivating the tobacco plants, would instead work on something worthwhile. Imagine all that money spent on tobacco products being spent on science and education.
Alcohol is not a good one either. Many people are truly addicted to this liquid. Although I am myself personally much less disgusted by alcohol addiction than tobacco addiction, I still think we should want to change things around it. I don’t want to infringe on anyone’s freedom to do with their body as they see fit, but I do think we need to allow people to make their own alcohol and forbid a corporate alcohol industry from setting root. Individual addictions like nicotine and alcohol addiction are things that hold humanity back globally because these addictions allow the addicts to be exploited easily. There are many more addictions I could list, but I think the solutions are similar if not the same. No more corporate exploitation of addictions. People should be free to do with their bodies as they see fit, as long as they do not negatively influence other people greatly, whether directly or indirectly.
In closing:
There’s so many more things I considered, but I don’t think I can just make a blueprint for a new world in one go. Two chapters is not enough, but I have to stop somewhere. I think public transport should be as cheap as it can be. We should be free to travel where we want to go. There should be no more insurance companies, at least not the way I know them. A future society should aim for global spiritual cleanliness without dictating the individual how to do it. There should be no system. We should enable only personal guidance on how to reach a state of inner dialogue. The rest comes naturally.
As you can see there’s ideas enough, but this world will not become stable on ideas alone. They might put us in the right direction, but we still need to walk the distance. Creating a new and better world will take time and effort. It will also take the hardship of what has yet to come. That is an essential ingredient needed to strengthen the foundations of this new world. I’m not sure if all these suggestions will be necessary in the future. I don’t know the people who will read this, and in a way I do not know how well they can be trusted to handle their new world with care and understanding in light of what went wrong in the past. I’m hoping all my “rules” and suggestions will be looked back at as historical references of just how mistrustful the people of Earth were in my days. Let people look at them and see them for what I hope they will one day considered to be the words of a blind man who by means of a miracle was standing in twilight about to observe his first sunrise, and who could see the light of the rising sun on the horizon, but who was still oblivious to the amount of light the day had in store for him.
A new day dawns on humanity. Although I am not looking forward to the trip to get there, I am really looking forward to meeting this new world and living in it.
~reckneya