09. The Nature of the Beast

Our consciousness travels into the multiverse by the decisions we make. This is the mechanism behind how our choices are conscious choices. We can predict the effects of our choices before making them. Our instincts guide us living beings through life, making sure we nourish ourselves, stay out of harms way, and reproduce. These instincts bloom into curious behaviours in intelligent beings, and that’s not limited to us humans at all. Sometimes they lead to obsessions and addictions, for example. These all have a negative association, but we shouldn’t judge ourselves and others on these behaviours. I think we should try to see them as interesting phenomenon within our behavioural existence that can teach us something about ourselves and reality. As a metaphor, you could state there are little bumps in the road that lead to a noticeable change of direction over time over a long enough distance. Those little bumps on the road are insignificant deviations in behaviours all life may show, but the more complex the life-forms, the more it can grow into something noticeable. Our intelligence accounts for the time and distance in this metaphor, so these behavioural deviations stand out a lot more in us.

But sometimes we see a deviation in the behaviour of animals we don’t associate with intelligence. A friend once told me a story about a tarantula that he held in captivity who made a pile of rocks in its enclosure, and one perfectly round pearl-like rock sat on top of the pile. It sat there loosely, and the smallest disturbance could trigger it to roll down. And from time to time it did because a door slammed shut roughly, or the tarantula or its prey disturbed the pile. Every time this happened, the tarantula would find the rock, take it into its jaws, and place it back carefully on top of the pile. I do not know how to explain this behaviour, and I find it fascinating this creature did this. This particular story about a tarantula is unique as far as I know, but it isn’t unique when it comes to stories about behaviour of animals we can’t really explain rationally. I think these behaviours reveal to us something about how consciousness takes shape into this physical realm. When this concerns an intelligent being these behaviours branch out into the most peculiar acts. I think art is the best example. In a sense, anything we create or do consciously is art. By making art we celebrate creation, and by enjoying art we pay homage to it. The more abstract the art, the more divine it is. This is because art by definition in my predictions is a way many new versions of the universe are created. For each stroke of a brush the universe splits off in to millions of new ones, each for every possible variation. We create so many variables when we make art, and I think many of our curious behaviours can be seen as art in the context of variable making. The more aware we are of this the more we are able to reach almost clairvoyant levels of consciousness when we put it into practise.

Addictions and obsessions are linked. They root in our instincts. The difference between an addiction and an obsession I suppose is that an addiction is an obsession the addict doesn’t really wants to have, or an obsession is an addiction from which the addict accepts most consequences, I suppose. When we obsess over something it can take many forms. I find it the most interesting one of the two, perhaps because I relate to it the most. I’ve had many obsessions in my life. I think the work you’re currently reading is probably one of them. It’s one of those projects I set my teeth in and couldn’t let go of. I’ve lived in this reality of writing these stories so intensely. I even dreamt of writing passages, just to wake up and realise it was a dream. After that I was still able to recall something useable to actually write down sometimes. Not all obsessions result in good –  or let’s say; harmless – things. We humans influence our world in almost everything we do, because of the way our society works. Humanity obsesses over wanting control. In some ways for some people it’s an unconscious addiction. Many people that hit rock bottom experience a sense of relief, because when there’s nothing to lose we let go of our ego. But with our egos embraced we become perpetual control freaks.

Control creates systems. Systems create situations in which we constantly divide the consequences of our choices over the many instead of accepting them fully ourselves, losing our connection with life; our own and that of others. This is why animals are most important to us. It is imperative we humans experience friendships with other animalkind. Maintaining a friendship with an animal can teach us to have an honest relationship with others, and hopefully an honest relationship with ourselves eventually. With few exceptions you cannot lie to your animal friend. It’s almost impossible. I can promise my dog I will feed him twice in the morning and then sleep in until noon and feed him once. I can tell it I will come home an hour early and be an hour late. The dog will just be extra relieved and happy when I show up. Though a dog can show disappointment, it may not understand your complex promises in words. The one agreement it does understand is the pattern of your habits it depends on, for example feeding time, or taking a long walk on sunny days. When you break that habit, you may sense its disappointment. And that’s the kind of disappointment from another being we truly feel the responsibility for, because the dog can’t tell you how it feels in words. It can’t lie to you. It can’t exaggerate its victimhood, or hide it from you. Its disappointment is pure, unfiltered and real.

The friendship we have with animals is a simple one, because we hold most if not all of the power. Therefore the relations we have with animals can be the most honest friendships we humans can have. Though, when it comes to interactions between us humans and other animalkind they often draw the short straw. We humans are mostly terrible news for other life-forms. We are master exploiters. Yet I still want to make a point for keeping and caring for animals. Of all the terrible things we can do to other animalkind, keeping them captive while making sure they are well fed, have no natural enemies to worry about, and receive healthcare, are among the least bad things I think we can do to them. And I firmly believe that someone who grew up learning to care for animals will grow up as a human being that will show love and compassion for beings, other people and animal alike. I think it is for this reason the NWO will try and forbid us from caring for animals, but they’ll pretend they’re doing this for the welfare of the animals. Evil doesn’t care about animal welfare, unless they can use it to promote their agenda. As soon as they’ve reached their goals, the fate of nature will be no different than that of all other subjects.

Keeping animals should come with a huge sense of responsibility, though. In my opinion, we have so much to improve here, and that’s not at all limited to our pets. Many pets can have a much better life than they get, but in the meat industry it’s so much worse. I’m not against the consumption of meat, but we are consuming entirely too much of it, and our animal brothers and sister suffer horribly in large numbers to feed our hunger for their flesh. Please understand that when I say I am not against eating meat, I don’t mean to say I am for it. I just think that if we eat meat we should make damned sure the animals we eat had the best life we could reasonably give them. Meat shouldn’t be a commodity, but something sometimes consumed. The only reason I am not against eating meat is that it is the way of life to consume other life. It is the curse of sentient life to have to nurture itself from the same life it observes, embraces, and enjoys. This is true for us, at least until we discover a way to free ourselves from these natural restraints. But until that day comes we don’t need that much meat in our diet. The worst thing is we ourselves mostly don’t kill the animals we eat ourselves. It’s most often done by machines. By letting machines kill our food we’ve become detached from the kill and therefore the meal. We don’t connect to our food any more because we reject the consequences of the kill.

We eat killed animals without feeling any remorse. We don’t see the suffering we cause, and can blame it on the masses. There is no empathy in our meat consumption. The industry we’ve set up to kill our animal brothers and sisters is akin to the extermination camps built by the Nazi’s during the second world war. It’s a machine that in much the same way is doing to our fellow animalkind what the machine the elites are building will do to us; efficient desolation of life and disposing of the remains. We humans are omnivores. Meat is part of our natural diet. But we only need a little. There is no need for all this suffering. Because of the way we’ve organised the meat industry we have effectively ran away from the consequences of the suffering we are undoubtedly causing on a large scale. It casts a dark shadow over our souls. We are to these animals what the elites are to us. We need to put a stop to this mass murdering of animals. Maybe we should only be allowed to eat the animals we’ve reared ourselves for at least a couple of years. It’d be damned hard to kill your animal buddy for its flesh. Imagine selling meat was forbidden, and meat was only be allowed to be shared in families. I’m not saying we should do this, but just as a hypothetical it reveals what I think is wrong with our meat consumption. I think if we’d do that, we would definitely cut down on our meat eating habits and never eat an ounce more than we would need. We would also bear the burden of the kill, and not be able to blame someone else for what’s on our plate. Our meat consumption is just one example of how dividing responsibility over the many casts the illusion there is no individual responsibility, resulting in consequence rejection. Since so many of us take part in these illusions, they are strong. Few feel any weight of the responsibilities they carry and don’t experience the consequences of their conduct, because we are too far removed from the consequences.

There are many more examples of how dividing consequence over the many results in the illusion there is no individual responsibility. We find another one in large companies. We’ve allowed companies to grow far too big. Companies themselves do things no individual in good conscious could do on their own. If I told my wife I’d been tracking her phone – noting in a log where she was, what she bought, who she talked to, what she talked about – she’d be absolutely appalled. But there’s many tech companies that do exactly this, and no one who works there feels responsible for it. There’s programmers, data analysts, graphic designers, service desk employees, financial managers, executive officers, etc. All take only a very small part in the process and so they divide the responsibilities over the many with terrible results. There is no empathy in their combined actions. When empathy disappears, evil emerges. Corporations behave like evil beings. The larger the company, the better this effect becomes visible. It also becomes apparent on the work floor. In a small company, laying someone off is a difficult decision. The larger the company is, the more executive and administrative layers it will have, the further the decision maker is removed from the person their decision will influence, and so the less they will feel empathy for laying someone off down below. Yet it is the same devastating news for that one person regardless of the size of the business they worked at. And even for minor things you can see this effect too. Imagine I took a pen from work and put it in my pocket. Obviously stealing isn’t something I want to promote, but just imagine it for me please. If a co-worker saw it, that’s a different conversation than when my direct superior saw it. Or what if the principle saw it? Or perhaps when his superior from the board of schools saw it? The higher I go in rank on this list, the less the potential conversation will be proportional to my misconduct because the higher up someone is to me, the less they are connected to me. The further removed the decision makers are from the people they decide over, the further those decisions will be removed from their empathy and may therefore be void of any empathy altogether.

This is the nature of the beast. We humans are social animals. Empathy is part of how we interact socially. In personal conduct and small groups we can reach our highest levels of cognition and empathy. On the other side of that spectrum are we at our most primitive when we interact in large groups. This is hardly apparent in small crowds, but I think when we go above 20 people (give or take a few) we hit a tipping point that goes down hill the bigger the group is – though this depends heavily on the individuals in each group. Suffice to say; stampedes don’t happen in small groups. In a classroom an individual student on their own would never misbehave the way students sometimes do when in a group. Just like the corporation, a group of people is an entity on its own. The bigger the group, the lower the cognitive social output of each individual in the group, and the further the individual is removed from their empathic abilities. I would like to stress I am a teacher by profession, and yes, I really am stating here putting children in large groups will handicap their ability to behave like a human individual. In education, smaller groups most often perform much better, because the interactions with the teacher become less one sided the smaller the amount of pupils in one group. It takes a special kind of teacher to be able to lift the cognitive level of each individual back up near its full potential when teaching large groups, and those teachers are rare. I know hundreds of teachers and only a handful have mastered this skill. Our educational institutes often hinge on how many of these special teachers they employ.

We need to be very weary of the mechanisms that release the apathetic beasts in our behaviour. We humans will always be subject to our instincts. These instincts are neither good nor bad, but if we live our lives removed from consequences of our choices these instincts will make us do evil things. In a world where the production is quantified by money, wealth will always pile up at places it should never be allowed to pile up. It piles up in systems where the people serve the system. These kinds of systems act like a will without a soul, and therefore act out the will of evil. Where money accumulates, corruption follows. When the money grows big so does its corruptive yield. Corruption is one of the favourite weapons of evil. And everyone has a price but the most strong willed and pure of heart. I sometimes wonder; what is my price? What are my moral values, ethics, and personal code of behaviour worth? At what price will I be compelled to waver them? I wouldn’t want to sucker-punch an innocent kid out of the blue, but what if I was offered 100 dollars? 10,000? 1,000,000? What if I was held at gunpoint and could either die or hit the kid. My live for his pain. What if I was offered a 1,000,000,000 dollars if I did or see my wife die if I didn’t? I’d like to believe I would not be easily corrupted, but I cannot be sure what my price is. I think everyone ultimately has a price, and those who’s price is higher than what the world can offer are the most righteous people I can imagine. This idea gives the expression “cheap” a new dimension. Easily corruptible people are cheap people. 

This current power grab by the NWO hinges on the corruptibility of people. They have corrupted many and influenced many more to volunteer unknowingly to deploy the agenda, but in the end they still have to operate within the system. In the film ‘The Matrix’, the control the machines had over the system from within the system suffered the limits that came with that system. This is true for the elites in this world too, at least until they’ve completed the rollout of their agenda. Until that time the system is being run by humans who can make choices, and most humans have some kind of function in that system. From judges, to soldiers, to farmers, to teachers, to electricians, you name it. The success of this rollout depends on those people making certain choices. That’s why the elites invested so heavily in media control. The decisions of the masses are key to their success or their failure. Those decisions depend on the verisimilitude of the pandemic, and the coming great hack, the great hunger, the great war, and the great alien invasion. But secrets have leaked out and the plan has been laid bare by a number of prominent people not in on the plan. The only thing keeping it from collapsing now is that the people who hear the real truth are confronted with a reality so frightening they might not be able to adopt it. This whole scam hinges on the believes of the masses. It’s not so much that most people don’t believe the contra-evidence, but more that they can’t face the truth that evidence implies. People don’t want to believe it’s the truth because of the incredible evil it reveals. The truth describes the existence of unspeakable evil, and the coming of incredible terror. The truth is so immensely horrifying that most will decide it therefore cannot be true.

Believers have also invested time and effort, and even submitted their bodies to that evil, and sometimes when people have been conned badly they’d rather tell themselves the lie was true than face the actual truth. Similarly, I think people cannot admit their servile conduct for this diabolic agenda with any ease, and I fear many believers will therefore actively uphold the lie, and fight for it in order to keep their believes verisimilar. These people are satan’s soldiers, unaware they have sealed their fate until it is far too late to turn back. A day will come when they no longer have the luxury to deny reality. In that moment the last hope for them is to repent and endure the consequences as trapped enlightened souls who can only beg to be set free. Or they can reject the truth and live the lie as unaware servants of evil. Nobody aspires to be evil. Evil beings will always fool you as they’ve fooled themselves they are representing the forces of good. I desperately hope before that time comes the people who were willing to see the truth before it manifested in full sight will be saved by the light.

~reckneya